ℹ️ Please view the counterpart proposals:
This proposal is for the global deployment of a progressively decentralized archive RPC network for Kusama and its system parachains. Please view the detailed forum post for the complete background of the initial Polkadot deployment.
DeServe is:
This proposal requests 3,003.00 KSM ($12,614.00 at 7-day EMA) as the first payment, first month upfront to bootstrap the global rollout of all Kusama services. Subsequent payments will be requested via 3-monthly retroactive proposals, alongside full transparency reports covering expenses, performance, and request analytics.
The following X posts document DeServe's first days of deployment:
Over the first two weeks of deployment, DeServe has served over 500 million requests, and is currently serving >36M requests/day.
Live request analytics are available at the public dashboard.
Kusama RPC services will be rolled out at 8 locations across 5 continents, optimized for coverage and budget efficiency for Kusama.
| Chain | Archive RPC | ETH RPC | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kusama Relay Chain | ✅ | - | To be deployed |
| Asset Hub | ✅ | ✅ | To be deployed |
| Coretime | ✅ | - | To be deployed |
| Bridge Hub | ✅ | - | To be deployed |
| Encointer | ✅ | - | To be deployed |
| People | ✅ | - | To be deployed |
DeServe delivers the lowest latency among all major Polkadot RPC providers for Polkadot Asset Hub, verified via Compare Nodes, a global RPC performance inspector.
| Comparison | Continents | Regions |
|---|---|---|
| DeServe vs IBP | 5/6 | 18-20/26 |
| DeServe vs OnFinality | 6/6 | 25/26 |
| DeServe vs Dwellir | 6/6 | 24/26 |
| DeServe vs LuckyFriday | 6/6 | 24/26 |
Full benchmark runs:
IBP is currently the only other provider offering a global geo-steered RPC service, making it the most appropriate reference for cost comparison.
Note that IBP operates on a 2N redundancy model, while DeServe operates on a single-instance model with rapid failover through backups, as detailed in the Monitoring & High Availability section.
Given the current cost constraints of the Polkadot ecosystem, we find that single instance per location with backup mechanisms in place should be sufficient under a highly responsive load-balancing system. DeServe’s current setup monitors endpoints every 15 seconds, immediately removing any unreachable endpoint from the pool.
The compared numbers below are taken from IBP dashboard billing view.
| IBP | DeServe | |
|---|---|---|
| Kusama Relay Chain | $66,226.50 | $8,345.00 |
| Asset Hub | $9,644.74 | $1,214.00 |
| Ethereum RPC | $538.30 | $69.00 |
| Bridge Hub | $6,926.66 | $873.00 |
| Coretime | $5,595.14 | $706.00 |
| Encointer | $5,595.14 | $706.00 |
| People | $5,567.62 | $701.00 |
| TOTAL | $100,094.10 | $12,614.00 |
| vs. IBP | - | 87% cheaper |
Our cost model is illustrated in detail in the initial forum post. DeServe also provides GeoDNS services for free as part of the package, whereas IBP charges $1,200.00/month for this service. DeServe also comes without curator payments, which add further overhead to bounty-based programs. IBP curator payments add approximately $3,400.00/month in additional overhead (reference).
Labour costs for the current alpha phase are excluded from this proposal and covered by Helikon. As DeServe matures, operator labour costs will be standardized through protocol governance.
Submerge is a data and compliance platform for Polkadot SDK chains, currently in development by Helikon. Submerge has received treasury funding and is behind schedule. Its two main components, Crystal (a chain indexer), Mycelium (a cross-chain indexer), along with their APIs for all supported chains will be delivered before any further on-chain submission for DeServe.
Helikon is a Polkadot-native infrastructure and software development collective based in İstanbul. A regular contributor to the Polkadot ecosystem at both the development and governance levels since late 2020:
Track: MediumSpender
Requested: 3,200 KSM ($13,500 USD at current 7-day EMA)
Period: April – December 2026 (9 months)
Cost: ~$1,500/month
Encointer is Kusama's second system chain, registered via Referendum 158. It provides Proof of Personhood, Sybil resistance, community currencies, and democratic governance tooling. It is the only system chain unique to Kusama – it does not exist on Polkadot.
This MediumSpender proposal requests funding for basic infrastructure operations of the Encointer system chain for 9 months (April–December 2026). The scope is strictly limited to keeping the chain running reliably: collators, RPC nodes, indexing, explorer, and accounting frontend. This is not a development or community growth proposal.
Encointer had comparable monthly active accounts to Kusama Asset Hub before the AHM migration. The data below shows that for recent months, both chains served a similar-sized user base – yet Encointer's operational costs are a fraction of what other system chains receive:
| Month | Encointer | KSM Asset Hub | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04 | 141 | 138 | Encointer > AH |
| 2025-05 | 173 | 138 | Encointer > AH |
| 2025-06 | 158 | 165 | Comparable |
| 2025-07 | 181 | 251 | Comparable |
| 2025-08 | 198 | 165 | Encointer > AH |
| 2025-09 | 203 | 185 | Encointer > AH |
| 2025-10 | 178 | 3,459 | AHM migration |
| 2025-11 | 182 | 4,962 | Post-AHM |
| 2025-12 | 155 | 3,848 | Post-AHM |
| 2026-01 | 155 | 3,703 | Post-AHM |
| 2026-02 | 149 | 3,370 | Post-AHM |
Source: Encointer litescan indexer. Subscan has refused to index Encointer as a system chain.
Before the Asset Hub Migration (Oct 2025), Encointer consistently matched or exceeded KAH in monthly active accounts. Encointer is one of the most actively used and still a very cost-efficient system chain in the Kusama ecosystem.
Kusama benefits directly from Encointer and should continue to fund it as a common good system chain. Its proof-of-personhood protocol and community currencies are not just theoretical — they are live experiments with active communities of meaningful size in the hundreds, enabling real experimentation with one-person-one-vote democracy that could complement Kusama's existing stake-weighted governance. Encointer also delivers tangible real-world impact: its Nyota pilot in Tanzania multiplied the economic impact of cash transfer subsidies by 240%, while the community in Nigeria are running solar-powered collator nodes that improve Kusama's own geographic decentralization. Encointer makes Kusama more democratic and more relevant.
This proposal covers five infrastructure components required to operate the Encointer system chain:
| Component | Description | Monthly Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Invulnerable Collators | Team-operated invulnerable collators/bootnodes for block production. Excluded from system chain collator bounty (Ref #643 funds only community invulnerables). | $500 |
| Load-Balanced RPC Nodes | Public RPC endpoints for wallets, dApps, and community access. Load-balanced for availability. | $350 |
| Litescan Indexer | Simple FOSS indexer providing chain data for explorer and accounting tools. Runs continuously. | $250 |
| Accounting Frontend | accounting.encointer.org – Transparency tool showing community treasury flows and token economics. | $200 |
| Explorer | explorer.encointer.org – Community status explorer for the Encointer chain. Public good for users and developers. | $50 |
| Monitoring & Ops | Alerting, uptime monitoring, trivial incident response, SSL/DNS management for all above services. | $150 |
| TOTAL (monthly) | $1,500 | |
| TOTAL (9 months) | April – December 2026 | $13,500 |
Fundraising efforts from external sources are ongoing and we see progress. Nevertheless, we may need to approach the Kusama Treasury for additional well-scoped packages on top of this one if we want to do more than mere basic maintenance.
The team commits to keeping the system running and performing minimal maintenance for the stated period even in case no further funding can be secured.
The system chain collator bounty (Ref #643) funds community invulnerable collators only. It explicitly allocates 2 slots for Encointer at $250/month each, paid to external community operators. The Encointer team's own 2 invulnerable collators are not eligible for this bounty. The RPC nodes, indexer, explorer, and accounting frontend are entirely unfunded by any other mechanism.
The Polkadot fellowship does not cover any work or infrastructure which is specific to Encointer although Encointer's runtime is maintained within the fellowship repositories.
Other system chain maintenance budgets are not transparently reported for public scrutiny.
Despite operating on one of the leanest budgets in the ecosystem, Encointer has delivered real-world impact:
| Proposal | Period | Amount | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref 636 | Jul–Dec 2025 | 73,811 CHF / 19,339 KSM | ❌ Rejected |
| Ref 564 | Jan–Jun 2025 | 61,592 CHF / 5,047 KSM | ✅ Awarded |
| Ref 489 | Jul–Dec 2024 | 64,300 CHF / 2,413 KSM | ✅ Awarded |
older proposals linked in all proposal documents
Upgrade to Release v2.2.0
Whitelisted by https://kusama.subsquare.io/fellowship/referenda/131
Replaced by https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/601
The following proposal is to request Kusama Governance to deregister paraID 2114, corresponding to Turing Network.
There are technical ways of being able to deregister a paraID, however none of these are currently available for paraID 2114.
First of, the paraID status is locked: true. This means that the only way deregister the paraID is by sending a message from the parachain itself. However, the team can't currently run the parachain, and thus it can't send a message to the parachain to perform the needed actions.
Encoded Key Storage: 0x3fba98689ebed1138735e0e7a5a790abcd710b30bd2eab0352ddcc26417aa1946e9b797315c3ac3942080000
Therefore, the only way to currently deregister the paraID is by governance approval on the Root track.
The paraID is owned by account CmxJEdEniSV6hGWoKfHWLR6h4A1dh5gD1vgzmD12osJvGsk (same storage item as before), which is the account sending this de-registration request.
https://kusama.subscan.io/account/CmxJEdEniSV6hGWoKfHWLR6h4A1dh5gD1vgzmD12osJvGsk
Rank #
Login to see your rank