This tip is for [Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj>) which follows this [template:](<https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w>)

- Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage

- Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence

- Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal

- Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc

- Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?

- Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only










Tips for [DOT Experts](https://t.me/dotxpert) are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.

Background:

- Hector did work on [Trappist](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs>) which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.

- [Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379>) aims to make **XCM NFT Interoperability** production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.


## Request for DOT Experts!

Ready to help OpenGov voters make informed political decisions?

Join the [DOT Experts Telegram Group](https://t.me/dotxpert)

This tip is for [Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj>) which follows this [template:](<https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w>)

- Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage

- Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence

- Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal

- Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc

- Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?

- Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only






**DOT Experts tips** are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.

Background:

* Hector did work on [Trappist](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs>) which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.

* [Proposal #379: NFT XCM](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/379) aims to make **XCM NFT Interoperability** production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.

DOT Experts Tip for Hector Bulgarini for Proposal #379: NFT XCM

This tip is for&nbsp;<a href="379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj">Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM</a> which follows this <a href="https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&amp;t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w">template:</a>
<ul>
<li>
Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage
</li>
<li>
Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence
</li>
<li>
Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal
</li>
<li>
Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc
</li>
<li>
Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?
</li>
<li>
Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only
</li>
</ul>

DOT Experts tips are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.
Background:
* Hector did work on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs">Trappist</a> which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.
* Proposal #379 aims to make <span style="font-family: Poppins, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration- display: inline !important; float: none;">XCM NFT Interoperability production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.
&nbsp;

This tip is for [Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj>) which follows this [template:](<https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w>)

- Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage

- Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence

- Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal

- Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc

- Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?

- Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only




**DOT Experts tips** are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.

Background: 

\* Hector did work on [Trappist](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs>) which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.

\* Proposal #379 aims to make <span style="font-family: Poppins, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration- display: inline !important; float: none;">XCM NFT Interoperability 

production grade across the Polkadot ecosystem.

This tip is for [Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj>) which follows this [template:](<https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w>)

- Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage

- Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence

- Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal

- Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc

- Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?

- Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only


**DOT Experts tips** are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs. 

Hector did work on [Trappist](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs) which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability, which #379 aims to make production grade across the Polkadot ecosystem.

Problem Statement:
- The problem is the lack of production-grade XCM NFT Interoperability across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Significance:
- This proposal is important because it aims to improve XCM NFT Interoperability, which is currently not production-grade.

Proposed Solution:
- The proposal aims to make XCM NFT Interoperability production-grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Expected Outcomes:
- The expected outcome is improved XCM NFT Interoperability, which will benefit the Polkadot ecosystem.

#422 DOT Experts Tip for Hector Bulgarini for Proposal #379: NFT XCM

No Active Proposals