Required infra: Root and Issuing CA's

There's some projects I have in the pipe at the design stage, but I require components to be cryptographically signed. As far as a trusted root and Issuing CA, why not polkadot itself? 
An address is the target for a smart contract that can sign CSRs on behalf of the network. 

A decentralized trusted authority. 

Opengov would need to be cleaned up first because if Issuing CAs became compromised in some way, we would need to take it/them down quickly, revoke the certs, and spin up new CAs. There would be a run book for this, and humans would need to spot it and call it out for the automation to execute the tasks. 

I know I talked about delegation before and people fired back that you trust the parity guys, but as stewards of a network meant to work in perpetuity one must design the delegation mechanics to include the inevitable eventuality that the stewards trusted today will one day be incapacitated or have passed on, and the next generation will need to take over from there. So this "I trust person x and Y and z right now" doesn't mean much to me, as we will need to have a way to trust new people in the future. 



Required Infra: Root and Issuing CAs

My governance proposal 

Feel free to interject, here are my thoughts. It's a living document, and open to critique. I'm trying to provide solutions, instead of complaining about a problem. 

QUADRATIC VOTING . 

-square the number of votes you'd like to submit to find out how many DOT that vote requires your account to possess in order to vote. 
For example: 
1 vote requires 1 DOT. 
5 votes requires 25 DOT. 
9 votes requires 81 DOT. 
And so on.... 

To prevent a sybil attack, I propose accounts with less than 256 DOT (close enough to the staking minimum) must pay 0.5 DOT as a gas fee to vote. This encourages whales to not spread their millions of DOT across millions of accounts to hedge their loss of voting power. 

NON-TRANSFERRABLE REPUTATION TOKENS .

Named 'HONOR' tokens from here on out

-Attached to your network address. 
-When the account is reaped, the reputation tokens are burned. 
-They are non transferable.
-Honor tokens can be lost via consensus as a mechanism to protect the network from account compromise. 
-Anyone can earn Honor token. 

Honor tokens would serve as a decentralized method to build a reputation and trust for benevolent actors.

SENATE

Synonymous with delegation. 
Those with the most honor token have option but not obligation to accept an invitation to become a senator, if nominated. 

-senators are nominated via community voting.
-senators are the only ones that can submit referenda.

-senators are the only ones who can vote for referenda.

-senators must stake enough DOT to earn rewards on the network.

-senators earn bonus DOT for voting on referenda. 

-senators lose honor for not voting. 

-senators can be slashed for malicious intent against the network. This is voted upon by the community. 

-when honor token is below a threshold, the senator is removed from the senate.


Now, you have to, the floor. Thanks for looking.


########EDIT##########
Thanks for the feedback!
So far I see no criticism of the Quadratic voting mechanism with a sybil tax. If this remains the case for a few more days, I'll drop that idea on polkassembly for more discussion. Thanks, team! We can't do it alone! Thanks for the effort! 
