Dear community,
Thank you for your assistance with helping to close and refund deposits associated with governance 1.0 proposals. When <a href="73">the proposal</a> was initiated there were already four (4) proposals already seeking reimbursement, to avoid double spends these refunds were excluded from the batch.
Now that these referenda have concluded without success I am inclined to also request refunds for their deposits to be equitable.
This proposal seeks to refund CCTF (123LuJKS65HaBbLSdDS46ByeC7bvQwA1iUhTpmjigQAfUKpK) with 360.20&nbsp;DOT for their <a href="../treasury/288">original proposal</a>. The rejected proposal can be found <a href="46">here</a>.
Disclaimer &amp; Context: This particular effort to refund participants is limited in scope to those who had proposals on the spend queue at the onset of Open Gov on Polkadot. A coordinated effort was required to avoid potential duplicate returns of deposits. If you feel aggrieved due to a proposal outside the scope of this exercise I suggest that you open an independent referenda.
&nbsp;

- The community is thanking everyone for helping with closing and refunding deposits for governance proposals.
- There were already four proposals seeking reimbursement before a new proposal was initiated.
- The new proposal is requesting a refund for a specific person's deposit.
- The refund is limited to those who had proposals on the spend queue at the start of Open Gov on Polkadot.
- If someone feels they should be refunded for a proposal outside of this scope, they can open an independent referenda.

#401 Refunding CCTF's GOV1 Treasury Spend Deposit

No Active Proposals