Dear community,
Thank you for your assistance with helping to close and refund deposits associated with governance 1.0 proposals. When <a href="73">the proposal</a> was initiated there were already four (4) proposals already seeking reimbursement, to avoid double spends these refunds were excluded from the batch.
Now that these referenda have concluded without success I am inclined to also request refunds for their deposits to be equitable.
This proposal seeks to refund RADIUMBLOCK.COM (13GtCixw3EZARj52CVbKLrsAzyc7dmmYhDV6quS5yeVCfnh1) with 500&nbsp;DOT for their <a href="../treasury/284">original proposal</a>. The rejected proposal can be found <a href="34">here</a>.
Disclaimer &amp; Context: This particular effort to refund participants is limited in scope to those who had proposals on the spend queue at the onset of Open Gov on Polkadot. A coordinated effort was required to avoid potential duplicate returns of deposits. If you feel aggrieved due to a proposal outside the scope of this exercise I suggest that you open an independent referenda.
&nbsp;

- The community is thanking everyone for helping with closing and refunding deposits for governance proposals.
- There were already four proposals seeking reimbursement, so those were excluded from the batch.
- Now, they want to refund RADIUMBLOCK.COM with 500 DOT for their original proposal.
- This refund effort is limited to those who had proposals on the spend queue at the start of Open Gov on Polkadot.
- If you have a proposal outside of this scope, you can open an independent referenda.

#400 Refunding Radium Block's GOV1 Treasury Spend Deposit

No Active Proposals