Dear community,
Thank you for your assistance with helping to close and refund deposits associated with governance 1.0 proposals. When <a href="73">the proposal</a> was initiated there were already four (4) proposals already seeking reimbursement, to avoid double spends these refunds were excluded from the batch.
Now that these referenda have concluded without success I am inclined to also request refunds for their deposits to be equitable.
This proposal seeks to refund PINK NODE (13EAhGcpe93mqSFZQrQ4P2cfpdAo5txWc5UQVTfEKDoqZjhw) with 172.387 DOT for their <a href="../treasury/246">original proposal</a>. The rejected proposal can be found <a href="40">here</a>.
Disclaimer &amp; Context: This particular effort to refund participants is limited in scope to those who had proposals on the spend queue at the onset of Open Gov on Polkadot. A coordinated effort was required to avoid potential duplicate returns of deposits. If you feel aggrieved due to a proposal outside the scope of this exercise I suggest that you open an independent referenda.
&nbsp;

- Problem Statement: Refunding deposits for unsuccessful governance proposals to ensure fairness.
- Significance: Ensuring equitable treatment for participants with unsuccessful proposals.
- Proposed Solution: Refunding PINK NODE with 172.387 DOT for their unsuccessful proposal.
- Expected Outcomes: Fairness and equity in refunding deposits for unsuccessful governance proposals.

#398 Refunding Pink Node's GOV1 Treasury Spend Deposit

No Active Proposals