Dear community,

With an upcoming runtime upgrade we should see the decommissioning of Governance 1.0 on the Polkadot network.  Associated with this are several unlocks of deposits including those associated with Treasury Spend Proposals.  There are already several teams who have requested immediate return of their deposits via tips or spend proposals on OpenGov or tips on Gov 1.0.  

This referendum seeks to reduce the number of refund requests and prevent double spends by:

- Slashing treasury deposits already returned to proposers 
- Slashing treasury deposits for proposers who have pending OpenGov proposals requesting or incorporating same
- Slashing Gov 1.0 tips and treasury deposits for applicable proposers. The proposers would have their treasury funding and tip deposit returns to their respective accounts
- Treasury deposits would be slashed and refunded to all those not matching the criteria to any of the above

The list of recipients was determined with collaboration with Otar who been keeping track of such refunds.  

Regards,
 


The proposal outlines the post-event report for Polkadot Decoded 2023, a hybrid event held in Copenhagen. With a focus on attracting decision-makers, enterprises, and the broader Polkadot community, the event featured presentations, workshops, and networking opportunities. It surpassed registration targets, generated new newsletter subscribers, and increased brand awareness through millions of impressions.

Maintain the continuous update and network stability of Magnet.

Logic design and function analysis.

Component Definition for Modularity.

Integrate MoveVM.

Integrate Lastic.

Integrate MultiSign and Proxy.

Upgrade Profit Control.

Upgrade Profit Calculation.

Upgrade Profit Distribution.

Upgrade Block Assurance.

Develop the user interface and the generator.

Integration and Testing.

Technical Documentation Writing.

- **Problem Statement:** Addressing the influx of refund requests associated with the upcoming decommissioning of Governance 1.0 on the Polkadot network.
- **Significance:** Preventing double spends and reducing the number of refund requests to streamline the transition process.
- **Proposed Solution:** Implementing measures to slash and refund treasury deposits based on specific criteria for proposers.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Efficient handling of refund requests, minimizing double spends, and ensuring a smooth transition during the runtime upgrade.

Rejecting Gov1.0 Treasury Proposals and Facilitating Bond Reimbursement where applicable

Treasury

#387 Rejecting Gov1.0 Treasury Proposals and Facilitating Bond Reimbursement where applicable

No Active Proposals