There is the risk that in future an excessive amount of treasury funds may be directed towards mythical. While it is obvious that the partnership between Polkadot and mythical is extremely beneficial to both parties, allowing mythical to process a number of transactions that would be impossible on any other chain and allowing Polkadot to showcase its technical prowess we also have to remain open to many other future partnerships and not exclusively focus on mythical. Mythical will already receive 1 million DOT from treasury in exchange for an airdrop of mythical token. This is of course great for both parties to solidify a winning partnership. However if we want to become the biggest platform for games we also have to be welcoming to other games, that's why Games Bounty [38] was created. I think it is important in order to allow fair competition and multiple opportunities to ensure that games bounty is not going to be used to fund activities related to mythical but instead focus on other games so that we can welcome diversity and competition. The request of this referendum is that the curators of Bounty 38 should not be allowed to fund anything related to mythical for the reasons I explained above

- **Problem Statement:** Risk of excessive treasury funds directed towards Mythical, potentially hindering diversity in partnerships.
- **Significance:** Ensuring fair competition and diversity in partnerships to maintain Polkadot's position as a leading platform for games.
- **Proposed Solution:** Curators of Bounty 38 should not fund anything related to Mythical to promote diversity and competition.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Maintain a balanced approach to partnerships, fostering a diverse ecosystem of games on Polkadot.

#990 Restricting games bounty (38) from investing in games related to mythical

No Active Proposals