Hello dear community,

Original top-up proposal referendum: https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/574

Top-up Proposal document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2gOWkyWkawAh7S-ov4T9QZYY0LsFuc8oylF2KaGaII

As you can see from the top-up proposal, our original request was made for $868,578 at an EMA7 of $10.282/DOT on 11/03/2024 (Yeah, we hit the top of the market :)). That equals 84,476 DOT

The funds came into our account on 18/04/2024 as you can see here https://polkadot.subscan.io/account/13UVJyLnbVp9RBZYFwHYxa6GPKJ2SqkGg4Mo7jG7uLAbPkT8?tab=balance_history, where the price was at $6.671/DOT. So if you translate that into dollars, we received $563,540, which is a difference of $305,038.

![1.png](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmYZ1LUwVzqwqTYjtf4honswQuGMLomvtQqBXoAHgdNd76)

We believe that this kind of requests should be made in USDT and only once, taking the difference in price between the proposal and the day the funds came into our account.

Thank you, everyone, for your understanding. 

Kind Regards,

Polkadot Anti-Scam Team

- **Problem Statement:** Addressing the discrepancy in funds received due to market price fluctuations in a top-up proposal, advocating for requests to be made in USDT to mitigate such differences.
- **Significance:** Ensuring transparency and accuracy in fund allocation, highlighting the impact of market price changes on received funds.
- **Proposed Solution:** Advocating for top-up requests to be made in USDT and only once, factoring in the price difference between the proposal and the actual receipt of funds.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Enhanced financial precision, reduced discrepancies in fund allocation, and improved accountability in handling proposals.

#935 Polkadot Anti-Scam Team refill due to price volatility

No Active Proposals