Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Medium Spender

Polkadot Anti-Scam Team refill due to price volatility

inMedium Spender
2 years ago
Rejected

Hello dear community,

Original top-up proposal referendum: https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/574

Top-up Proposal document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2gOWkyWkawAh7S-ov4T9QZYY0LsFuc8oylF2KaGaII

As you can see from the top-up proposal, our original request was made for $868,578 at an EMA7 of $10.282/DOT on 11/03/2024 (Yeah, we hit the top of the market :)). That equals 84,476 DOT

The funds came into our account on 18/04/2024 as you can see here https://polkadot.subscan.io/account/13UVJyLnbVp9RBZYFwHYxa6GPKJ2SqkGg4Mo7jG7uLAbPkT8?tab=balance_history, where the price was at $6.671/DOT. So if you translate that into dollars, we received $563,540, which is a difference of $305,038.

1.png

We believe that this kind of requests should be made in USDT and only once, taking the difference in price between the proposal and the day the funds came into our account.

Thank you, everyone, for your understanding.

Kind Regards,

Polkadot Anti-Scam Team

Comments (4)

profile
Endes
2 years ago

Price volatility should be priced into proposals, what happens when price goes up 2-3x you refund? It makes no sense these refill proposals at all.

2 years ago

Aye, more than 30 % of variation of price

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

USDT
305.04K USDT

Proposal Failed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2026

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy