Maintenance for the substrate-api-client Jul-24 to Dec-24
Beneficiary:We'd like to fund maintenance of the substrate-api-client from July 2024 until December 2024.
The substrate-api-client is a Rust library for connecting to a substrate-based node via RPC from a no-std environment, like trusted execution environments or IoT devices. An RPC client is a library, with similar features as Polkadot-js. With an RPC client developers can easily interact with any Polkadot or Kusama chain. There are RPC clients for different programming languages. For Rust, the most popular RPC client is subxt. The substrate-api-client uses core functionality of subxt and makes it available in a no-std environment.
This proposal is a continuation of our previous maintenance proposals. The previous proposal can be found here. See also our reports in the comments section of each proposal. We aim to seek ongoing funding.
Details can be found in our full proposal
Requested Funding: $33’300
Comments (6)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (55)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (2)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Aye! I support this proposal and have only good things to say about the SCS team. They have been part of the ecosystem since the very beginnings and have always delivered quality. And the proposal seems very reasonable too.
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
Members discussed the usefulness of this api client, and that it has lots of forks/stars/contributors.
ChaosDAO has previously voted on the following referendums from this proponent: 118 - aye; 290 - aye
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback.