Hello all,&nbsp;
I have wrote all my thoughts regarding proposal #684 in the below document. I know it's passing at the moment, but I could not let this go through without putting something on paper.&nbsp;
I have linked this document below for the community to review. If you would like to offer feedback or have a futher discussion about this prospoal I am happy to. You can contact me on Twitter. @OnlyDeFiGuy&nbsp;
I will be voting NAY on this proposal and I would recommend others do the same.&nbsp;
Regards,&nbsp;
OnlyDeFiGuy
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kGECKw28q-gvNX67BopuDXQB2AqOx1B6V9VAaFc40X8/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kGECKw28q-gvNX67BopuDXQB2AqOx1B6V9VAaFc40X8/edit?usp=sharing</a>

Report : Proposal #684 Chainalysis analytics solutions on Polkadot Relay Network

General

- **Problem Statement:** OnlyDefiGuy presented a contentious and complex proposal (#684) on behalf of Dotizens, requiring courage and expertise.
- **Significance:** The proposal involves a multistage payout mechanism for up to 999 DOT, impacting the community's understanding of treasury spending and potential future proposals.
- **Proposed Solution:** Implement a multistage payout proposal with three treasury spends at specific block heights.
- **Expected Outcomes:** If passed, the proposal could set a precedent for future time-based and delivery-based milestone payments, potentially influencing the handling of significant funds like 1MM DOT vs 10MM USD.

#781 Report : Proposal #684 Chainalysis analytics solutions on Polkadot Relay Network

No Active Proposals