Propose Curator for IBP
This proposal seeks to set the curators for the IBP bounty as outlined in the approved Proposal 649
Pure Proxy: 1EkXxWpyv5pY7t427CDyqLfqUzEhwPsWSAWeurqmxYxY9ea
Multisig Address: 14B1PrRGJX9JNcNrsLC8j3cie5KmzWkCXaYR9wKrjqKFuzht
Signatories (Threshold 3/5)
1erinozp829iWKdSTeik8TWjtnU4DCX4WntDwdiwN5mMjWHErin - Parity14z2CnmqMX2kcWGp5VT68sovjKXZipjkNUPtaMMnz6cjXW3qOtar - Ecosystem14Xp8qTpNxZ1xfXHZvZMCMF14Uutn42eULPiwkC1yNHBjoajAnaelle - Parity12uGpe3gqSeCWSX4Lk2LTru9hFjgjWDqxrNhubwJrri9QFgDBenjamin - Astar13mUoL3pRW6JGtqkFf3Kzn2WEeqbuchtVMRziXdBxdF3Rn2fCoinStudio - Ecosystem
Comments (1)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (75)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (3)0.0 DOT
Comments (1)
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
-
Members are familiar with the curators and their reputations within the Polkadot ecosystem
-
This bounty was already approved under a previous proposal, therefore it is not logical to block the assignment of the curators, who were known to the community prior to the previous referendum being approved.
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback. We would like to disclose that some of our members are affiliated with this referendum, be that on the submission, operational side or on the curator team. However, the number of affiliated members is vastly outnumbered by the number of non-affiliated members who voted AYE on this proposal. Additionally, our internal processes dictate that those with a COI for a particular referendum must recuse. Therefore we are confident that ChaosDAO's vote unequivocally does not represent a COI.
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
Members are familiar with the curators and their reputations within the Polkadot ecosystem
This bounty was already approved under a previous proposal, therefore it is not logical to block the assignment of the curators, who were known to the community prior to the previous referendum being approved.
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback. We would like to disclose that some of our members are affiliated with this referendum, be that on the submission, operational side or on the curator team. However, the number of affiliated members is vastly outnumbered by the number of non-affiliated members who voted AYE on this proposal. Additionally, our internal processes dictate that those with a COI for a particular referendum must recuse. Therefore we are confident that ChaosDAO's vote unequivocally does not represent a COI.