Rejecting Gov1.0 Treasury Proposals and Facilitating Bond Reimbursement where applicable
Dear community,
With an upcoming runtime upgrade we should see the decommissioning of Governance 1.0 on the Polkadot network. Associated with this are several unlocks of deposits including those associated with Treasury Spend Proposals. There are already several teams who have requested immediate return of their deposits via tips or spend proposals on OpenGov or tips on Gov 1.0.
This referendum seeks to reduce the number of refund requests and prevent double spends by:
- Slashing treasury deposits already returned to proposers
- Slashing treasury deposits for proposers who have pending OpenGov proposals requesting or incorporating same
- Slashing Gov 1.0 tips and treasury deposits for applicable proposers. The proposers would have their treasury funding and tip deposit returns to their respective accounts
- Treasury deposits would be slashed and refunded to all those not matching the criteria to any of the above
The list of recipients was determined with collaboration with Otar who been keeping track of such refunds.
Regards,
Comments (3)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (152)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (9)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Comments (3)
It looks like you are slashing the deposit of anyone who requested reimbursement with gov2, either as a tip or as part of a proposal. What if the gov2 request fails?
Is this reimbursement for previously rejected treasury spendings also? It will be cool and fair to return all the bonds and make the same for Kusama!
It looks like you are slashing the deposit of anyone who requested reimbursement with gov2, either as a tip or as part of a proposal. What if the gov2 request fails?
Is this reimbursement for previously rejected treasury spendings also? It will be cool and fair to return all the bonds and make the same for Kusama!