Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Medium Spender

Vote Nay

inMedium Spender
2 years ago
Rejected

We have decided to revoke this proposal, in order to submit a new proposal with changes incorporating feedback and discussions with delegates.

Comments (8)

DV Badge
2 years ago

How does the demography compare between the multi token wallet user (Infinity and others) and the wallet specific user (Talisman, Nova, etc.). Do you think that there is any overlap or are they completely different> Is there any hard data on this? It'd be great to have an idea about the difference between the prospective users that would use Nova+Talisman vs other multi-token wallets. In many aspects: geographically, experience, age and so on.

profile
Endes
2 years ago

@Infinity Wallet Official Multi-chain wallets are generally far more friendly, caputring a much larger user base, but I find most lack more specific/custom support for individual chains. What I like about your proposal is that you are looking to integrate all the specifics of Polkadot and its parachains similar or possibly more then current Polkadot only wallets, which is something quite unique and I find is missing in the ecosystem to achieve signifcant on-chain adoption.

I also like the fact that its a desktop wallet and not a browser extension, this is something currently lacking in the ecosystem and could open the Polkadot ecosystem up to new users on desktop. Also I just noticed the proposal mentions a web3 browser, this is really cool as that is something really lacking in the space. Personally I don't find browser extensions that intuitive so having a browser for web3 would be insane for improving UX.

Personally looking forward to using your wallet if your proposal is passed.

2 years ago

No need! we have too many wallets, each ecosystem should have only 1-2 good wallets. Earn money by yourself through your project, not using empty promise and PPT

profile
Endes
2 years ago

I agree that an ecosystem does need some good wallets. Problem is the ecosystem doesn't even have 1 good wallet yet, nor do we even have full support from a single multi-chain wallet. So at the moment we ideally need more wallets that actually are innovating, which the current ecosystem wallets are very unfriendly. If they can deliver on this proposal, a user friendly solution like this wallet with all that they propose may be the good wallet we need.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
31.50K DOT

Proposal Failed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2026

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy