Paraphrasing Basti from <a href="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2507#issuecomment-1828227653" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this comment</a>:
<blockquote>
The runtime upgrade to Polkadot&nbsp;<code>0.8.28</code>&nbsp;had the following migration:&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/371681c298eb96b74ad04a09ca8097f19c777e68/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L968">https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/371681c298eb96b74ad04a09ca8097f19c777e68/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L968</a>
The second parameter to the&nbsp;<code>apply</code>&nbsp;function was the old&nbsp;<code>CandidacyBond</code>. It was passed as&nbsp;<code>1 DOT</code>&nbsp;while it was actually in the release before:&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/2f84569930a4ae86a3ecd60fff3488753ab79aa6/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L489"><code>100 DOT</code></a>.
The result is now that some accounts only got 1 DOT unreserved, while it should have been 100 DOT.
</blockquote>
This referenda calls <code>Balances::force_unreserve</code> for the two accounts which had incorrect amounts unreserved.
See <a href="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2507">this issue</a> for more information.

Paraphrasing Basti from <a href="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2507#issuecomment-1828227653" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this comment</a>:

> The runtime upgrade to Polkadot `0.8.28` had the following migration: [https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/371681c298eb96b74ad04a09ca8097f19c777e68/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L968](<https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/371681c298eb96b74ad04a09ca8097f19c777e68/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L968>)

> The second parameter to the `apply` function was the old `CandidacyBond`. It was passed as `1 DOT` while it was actually in the release before: [`100 DOT`](<https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/2f84569930a4ae86a3ecd60fff3488753ab79aa6/runtime/polkadot/src/lib.rs#L489>).

> The result is now that some accounts only got 1 DOT unreserved, while it should have been 100 DOT.

This referenda calls `Balances::force_unreserve` for the two accounts which had incorrect amounts unreserved.

See [this issue](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2507) for more information.

Correct for insufficient `phragmenElection.renounce` unreserve amount

See [`Pallet::dispatch_whitelisted_call_with_preimage`].

Problem Statement:
- Some accounts in Polkadot were only allocated 1 DOT instead of the intended 100 DOT.

Significance:
- This issue affects the allocation of funds for certain accounts in Polkadot.

Proposed Solution:
- The referenda calls for using Balances::force_unreserve to correct the allocation for the affected accounts.

Expected Outcomes:
- The affected accounts will have the correct amount of 100 DOT unreserved.

#474 Compensate for insufficient `phragmenElection.renounce` unreserve amount