View All Medium SpenderinMedium Spender
Beneficiary:(11.66K DOT)
Requested:11.66K DOT
Executed
Private Transfers of DOT
5840 days ago
This is a retroactive treasury spend proposal by Integritee AG
We ask the treasury for 87'377 USD = 11'655 DOT
Work done:
- Implement Incognitee Sidechain which can transfer a relaychain native token privately by shielding it to L2 and eventually unshielding it back to the relay chain without linkability
- Demo Video where we shield DOT from a local Asset Hub to Incognitee and back
- We are now able to transfer ROC privately (on public Rococo testnet)
Next Steps:
- launch a public test campaign and bug bounty on our Rococo testnet which we launched in Dec 2023
- Support for Asset Hub and its fungible assets, i.e. USDC/USDT
- Support for ANY substrate based chain and its assets
Some History:
- Initial Blog outlining the Vision
- Previous attempt Referendum 17 for treasury funding (was also retro-active, but deemed to be too early for retro-active by commentors):
edit:
You can now test our tech on our Rococo testnet
Comments (9)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (212)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (18)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
First off I want to say it's great that the dotsama ecosystem gets more privacy friendly ways to store and send dot.
Questions:
Manta is another player in the privacy field here. With mantas zkassets coming to dot, allowing what I interpret as achieving the same outcome where a users can not find source and destination. What are the main differences in your approach Vs manta?
What are the pros and cons compared to what your suggesting?
Thanks
~ flipchan
This is one of the teams with the greatest potential. Excellent work by Alain and his team.