Proposal: ink! design security review by OpenZeppelin (treasury proposal 2/2)
Beneficiary:Given the successful completion of OpenZeppelin’s security review of the ink! smart contract language & Substrate’s smart contracts pallet, this community proposal is for the second installment supporting OpenZeppelin’s work. During this engagement, OpenZeppelin identified 11 total issues within the codebase. We are pleased to report that working with the Parity team throughout this process has been fantastic.
The finalized report can be found on OpenZeppelin’s blog: https://blog.openzeppelin.com/security-review-ink-cargo-contract/
The ink! team has acknowledged all issues. Two of the ink! issues have been solved, seven of the cargo-contract suggestions have been implemented; the rest are actively being addressed.
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (108)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (24)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Hello! We invite a member of the team to join the AAG Live Show to help us better understand this initiative! Please reach out on Matrix @ jay-chrawnna:matrix.org Thanks! 🙏
Hello,
We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79
Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.
For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist