Retroactive Fund - Optimizing Polkadot Multisig: Mimir’s Enhanced Features & Ecosystem Integration
Proponent: 14pa3BAYZLPvZfRDjWEfZXZWBVU45E67HUQEUxNCrdXGoata
Date: 2025/5/10
Duration: 4 Months
Proposal Payment: 157,000 USDT
Project Category: Infrastructure/Dapp
Website: https://app.mimir.global/
Github: https://github.com/mimir-labs
Short description: Mimir is a powerful multisig solution designed for enterprises, DAOs, and large asset holders in the Polkadot ecosystem. This proposal focuses on enhancing usability, scalability, and security through 4 key innovations including Call Templates, Omni UX, Multisig API, and WalletConnect integration. With over 2,000 users and growing adoption across multiple Polkadot rollups, Mimir is poised to become the standard for multisig operations in Polkadot.
This is a follow up proposal to our previous retroactive proposal.
Full Proposal
Link: Retroactive Fund - Optimizing Polkadot Multisig: Mimir’s Enhanced Features & Ecosystem Integration
Key Takeaway
Call Template
Predefined transaction templates simplify common DAO & team operations, eliminating the need for manual data input each time.
https://x.com/Mimir_global/status/1908096583339851798
Omni UX
Seamless management of multi-sig accounts across multiple parachains, enabling a unified cross-chain experience.
https://x.com/Mimir_global/status/1919703444593770821
Mimir PAPI SDK
The Mimir PAPI SDK makes it easier for more applications to onboard multisig and proxy users, while the integration with ReactiveDOT allows developers to connect with Mimir more seamlessly.
Bounty Manager | DOTConsole | ReactiveDOT | DOTConnect
Proposer & Multisig API
Allowing enterprises and DAOs to incorporate multi-sig approval processes into their internal operations, such as budgeting, resource allocation, and strategic decision-making.
Comments (8)
Requested
Proposal Passed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (65)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (15)0.0 DOT











Hello,
According to reference websites such as (https://msadvisory.com/average-salary-in-china/), (https://uiuxjobsboard.com/salary/ui-ux-designer/china) and (https://www.glassdoor.com.ar/Sueldos/shanghai-ux-designer-sueldo-SRCH_IL.0,8_IM999_KO9,20.htm), the salaries in China with senior experience for the positions presented are as follows (Average Monthly Salary) :
PM: 20,000 – 40,000 CNY = 2,775.08 - 5,550.16 USD
Dev: 20,000 – 40,000 = 2,775.08 - 5,550.16 USD
UI/UX: 15,000 – 30,000 CNY = 2,081.31 - 4,162.62 USD
Research: 15,000 – 30,000 CNY = 2,081.31 - 4,162.62 USD
However, in your application for all cases, it is more than double that. What justification could you provide to validate your requirements?
@SIM-DOT
Hi,
Thank you so much for your thoughtful question. I completely understand your concern—cost control and salary standards are important issues, and they play a key role in ensuring the Treasury's funds are used responsibly.
I’d like to take this opportunity to clarify a few points as openly and sincerely as possible.
While the data platforms you referenced do offer average salary benchmarks, they don’t always reflect the full context—such as years of experience, position level, performance-based incentives, or actual responsibility scope.
In our case, our team members (developers, product, and researcher roles) each have 5–7 years of experience. Our part-time UI designer has over 10 years of experience. Our team members could be compared to ByteDance 2-2 or Alibaba P7 standards. We’ve calculated hourly rates based on these real-world annual packages, and we’re happy for them to be cross-checked. That said, we’re still operating below top-tier salaries offered by firms like Huawei or Pinduoduo.
Reference links:
90 小红薯68254D3F发布了一篇小红书笔记,快来看吧! 😆 IbOoKZeM1rmCh93 😆 http://xhslink.com/a/6Ews9MWtRlScb,复制本条信息,打开【小红书】App查看精彩内容!(Copy all the word and open Rednote)
Beyond base salary, I also hope you’ll consider the following:
I hope this gives you a clearer and more realistic picture of our situation, and helps you make a more informed judgment. We truly appreciate your time and consideration.
PolkaWorld voted AYE
With two-thirds in favor and one-third opposed.
Supportive points:
Opposing point:
There’s a question of whether ongoing development of projects in the Polkadot ecosystem should all rely on Treasury funding. There’s a need to establish a sustainable long-term business model.
For full comments, please visit here.
@polkaworld
Thank you to Polkaworld for the support!
We look forward to delivering even more user-friendly products for the community.