Thanks to Basti for helping us with the Whitelisting part of this <3

See discussion: https://polkadot.subsquare.io/posts/408

# Summary

This referendum proposes the following changes:
## Snowbridge-wrapped USDC:

- Set as [sufficient asset](https://wiki.polkadot.network/general/web3-and-polkadot/#sufficient-assets)

- Set [existential deposit](https://support.polkadot.network/support/solutions/articles/65000168651-what-is-the-existential-deposit-) to $0.01 (MinBalance: 10 000)
- Set metadata:
  - Name: USDC (Snowbridge)
  - Symbol: USDC
  - Decimals: 6 (it is currently 6, this just adds that to the metadata)

## Snowbridge-wrapped USDT:
- Set as [sufficient asset](https://wiki.polkadot.network/general/web3-and-polkadot/#sufficient-assets)
- Set [existential deposit](https://support.polkadot.network/support/solutions/articles/65000168651-what-is-the-existential-deposit-) to $0.01 (MinBalance: 10 000)
- Set metadata:
  - Name: Tether USD (Snowbridge)
  - Symbol: USDT
  - Decimals: 6 (it is currently 6, this just adds that to the metadata)

It is worth mentioning that we believe a lot of the Polkadot DAO think the only sufficient assets on Polkadot Asset Hub are DOT, USDC (Native), and USDT (Native), but there are some additional ones, including:
- [ETH](https://ibb.co/zVgQGbV3) (Snowbridge)
- [WETH](https://ibb.co/WpWCYGRz) (Snowbridge)
- [KSM](https://ibb.co/ZZkmD26) (P<>K Bridge)

This referendum basically adds to that list, we believe that it is beneficial to make obviously valuable (ETH/WETH for example) or stable assets (stables from Ethereum) sufficient. It is also entirely possible to remove sufficiency from an asset in the future.

View the full context:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRbLwGg2PW-uxyO4PLNrm350HDteBMTc7X3_vy_hYkJdLu2BJSnohh83nJiQvU3rRTGpD0xNqRX9EWG/pub

Cheers,

[Leemo](https://x.com/LeemoXD), [N4DRO](https://x.com/N4DRO), [lolmcshizz](https://x.com/lolmcshizz) and [Crane](https://x.com/0xCrane)


- **Problem Statement:** Addressing the Whitelisting part of the Polkassembly ReferendumV2.
- **Significance:** Ensuring proper functioning and security of the Polkassembly ReferendumV2.
- **Proposed Solution:** Assistance from Basti in handling the Whitelisting aspect.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Improved efficiency and security in the Whitelisting process for Polkassembly ReferendumV2.

#1510 Set Snowbridge-wrapped USDC & USDT as sufficient assets, set their ED to $0.01, and set their metadata on Asset Hub

No Active Proposals