Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Medium Spender

Fuelarts x BitBasel | The Artists & Collectors Polkadot Hub to onboard 2000+ new & engaged users, 300+ projects and 10K+ transactions

inMedium Spender
10 months ago
Rejected

Summary: Fuelarts and BitBasel have refined their previous proposal for Polkadot, integrating community feedback to address the ecosystem's needs. We propose a structured 6-month educational program bridging artists, collectors and brands in the NFT 2.0 space. Building on Polkadot's significant 2024 growth — where transactions tripled and NFT minting set records — the milestone-based proposal fosters supply and demand plus a revenue-sharing model back to the treasury. This strategy enhances sustainability and transparency, aiming to develop a thriving community of artists and collectors, and solidify a leadership role for Polkadot within this $1.7 Trillion Asset Class.

A discussion document has been posted ahead of the treasury proposal submission.

Tl;dr Amount requested: $316K USDT


The project was presented on AAG #216 on March 20 (video starts at the presentation segment):


Click here to view the Pitch Deck

Click here to view the Full Description

Click here to view the Project's Breakdown

Click here to view the Targeted KPIs


Polkadot has built an exceptional blockchain infrastructure — but adoption depends on engagement. Now comes the real challenge — activating both supply and demand. We need artists, collectors, brands and investors to engage with the ecosystem. This initiative closes the gap, equipping artists and collectors with the tools to bring NFT 2.0 to life.

We invite you to review our proposal, collaborate with us, and be part of shaping the future of creative technology on Polkadot.

Watch us live at AAG sessions in the coming weeks and ask your questions in real time! Thank you.

Denis, Fuelarts / Scott, BitBasel

Comments (8)

10 months ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received zero aye and six nay votes from ten members, with two members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Voters expressed significant skepticism about a proposal related to the NFT market within Polkadot. Concerns included a lack of strategic direction in the art space, doubts about the potential return on investment, and the disproportionate allocation of the budget toward management and supervision. Some voters suggested that the focus should shift towards building a stronger artist community and engaging with existing networks, rather than committing substantial funds at this stage. Overall, many felt that the current approach lacked the necessary structure and clarity for success.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

10 months ago

@PERMANENCE DAO/GOV-PROXY

Dear Permanence DAO,

Thank you for your detailed feedback and for taking the time to outline the concerns shared by your members. We deeply value the governance process, and your reflections help us strengthen both our communication and our proposal.

Thank you also for acknowledging the depth of preparation behind our proposal. We've been studying the digital asset market since its emergence and consulted both global Web3 leaders and key voices within Polkadot’s art-related community before submitting — specifically to verify the need for this program and understand potential ecosystem support.

That said, we also acknowledge that the enthusiasm and support expressed before submission has not fully translated into active voting or engagement — this, too, is a valuable lesson for us.)

While we respect your Nay vote at this stage, we’d like to take this opportunity to address the key themes raised across your members’ comments — we’ve carefully reviewed each of them.

Strategic Alignment with Polkadot & the NFT Narrative

We understand the skepticism around the NFT market — especially given recent downturns in transaction volume. However, our initiative is not built around the outdated "NFT 1.0" model. The Artists & Collectors Polkadot Hub focuses on NFT 2.0 — a new approach that integrates real-world assets, AI art, utility tokens, and cultural engagement models, grounded in tangible use cases, academic infrastructure, and measurable KPIs.
Rather than chasing speculative hype, we are responding to the strategic direction already endorsed by Polkadot's ecosystem itself. For example:

  • The 2024 Polkadot End-of-Year Report highlights performance leadership in NFT minting speed, transaction throughput, and daily active users.
  • The NFTMosaic initiative from Unique Network — whom we consulted with in building this proposal — signals a renewed institutional focus on next-gen digital ownership tools within the Polkadot ecosystem.

In short, our project is not chasing the past, but actively helping shape the future of creative digital assets on Polkadot.

Market Size vs. Strategic Potential

The cited $1.7 trillion figure does not refer to the NFT market in isolation, but rather to two separate but related figures:

  • The global annual turnover of the physical creative industries—including art, music, fashion, design, film, and more. (This figure ranges from $1.7 to $2.6 trillion, depending on whether sectors like apparel are included.)
  • The total value of global art and collectibles, based on sources like Deloitte and ArtTactic. While estimates vary, Fuelarts places this figure at approximately $3 trillion, including artworks held in museum collections.

In both cases, these numbers represent the Potentially Addressable Market (PAM) — assets and industries that are increasingly expected to receive digital counterparts as they transition into Web3. Our program is designed to onboard creators and collectors from these industries into Polkadot’s ecosystem through practical education, on-chain experimentation, and brand collaborations.

We believe Polkadot, with its unmatched interoperability, scalability, and security, has the potential to lead this transition — and our proposal seeks to bridge the infrastructure that already exists with real-world users who haven’t yet arrived.

Budget Structure and ROI Concerns

We acknowledge the concern around budget allocation. However, the majority of the funding is not for management overhead but for the actual delivery of weekly educational activities, live mentorship, hackathons, and on-chain prototype development across both artist and collector tracks.

This includes:

  • A university-hosted physical program for 12 artists (hands-on mentoring)
  • A global online program for artists and collectors (scalable outreach)
  • Weekly live workshops, DAO education, and technical support
  • The on-chain revenue-sharing mechanism, where a portion of future project sales is automatically routed back to the Treasury

We're not simply educating — we're building tools, launching projects, and generating on-chain activity that can be measured and audited.

Ecosystem Engagement & Mentor Selection

The mentors involved are established names with clear, public track records — spanning former curators of the Venice Biennale to ex-Christie’s and Tezos leaders. These are practitioners, not figureheads. That said, we hear your concern regarding visibility within the Polkadot community.

That’s why we’re coordinating with Unique Network (Aleksandar, Charu) to ensure better alignment, and we’re planning an AMA session to open the floor for further community Q&A. We'll also consider initiating a smaller pilot version of the program through a Roots grant or other channel if that would help ease implementation concerns.

Value to the Broader Community

Although Miami is a key offline location, 50% of the program is conducted online — specifically designed to benefit global creators and collectors, not just a local cohort. All participants are required to open a Polkadot wallet, ensuring on-chain engagement from day one. The long-term vision is to replicate this model across other regions and communities — including those already active on Polkadot today.

We deeply appreciate your concerns and suggestions and remain open to dialogue and collaboration — whether through mentorship, phased implementation, or adapting the structure further in response to ecosystem needs.
Thank you again for your thoughtful engagement. We'll share AMA details shortly and would be honored to continue this conversation in a more interactive format.

Denis Belkevich, Fuelarts
/ Scott Spiegel, BitBasel
// Co-Authors, Fuelarts x BitBasel Proposal

10 months ago

Lucky Friday would like to provide the following feedback from our team members. We have been specifically solicited to provide feedback on this particular referendum, collectively offering it and hope that it will help the proposer(s) of this referendum moving forward. As noted before, our team collectively landed on a NAY outcome.

While some team members were offered positive comments about the team and the idea, the majority of the team did not see the ROI or value proposition, especially when considering the state of NFTs in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Lucky Friday votes as a collective based on the results of our internal voting procedures and enacted on chain via the OpenGov server bot. No single team member is required to provide any feedback about why he or she has voted in a particular direction, although it is highly encouraged and happens often. With respect to our team members' right to anonymity and the private format in which we conduct our votes, we will not be sharing the names of individuals who have chosen to provide said feedback.

We encourage all members of the Polkadot community to join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx

10 months ago

@LuckyFridayGovProxy 

Thank you, Lucky Friday, for your vote and this update. Following your suggestion, we've reached out via the OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram and tagged Phunky with our referendum number to request full feedback. Once we receive and review your comments, we’ll respond here accordingly.

Looking forward to continuing the dialogue and learning from your insights.

Best, Denis & Scott // Fuelarts x BitBasel

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

USDT
316.00K USDT

Proposal Failed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2026

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy