Back to root
Deciding

#1501 Renewal of treasury USDT and USDC Acquisition

Proposer:
rtti5220
 
in Democracy
5 days ago

Track: Root

Proposer: ChaosDAO, JUST Ventures, Hydration

Date: March 2025

Requested allocation: 5,001,000 DOT

Short description: We proposed a structured approach for the Polkadot Treasury to obtain native USDT and USDC, for the purpose of diversification and enabling it to pay out expenses in a stable asset. Through this referendum, we aspire to renew the schedule presented in proposal #457 and convert 2,500,000 DOT into USDT and 2,500,000 DOT into USDC via the DCA mechanism described in detail below, where an additional 1000 DOT is reserved for transaction fees. This proposal presents a long-term solution to acquire different tokens in exchange for treasury DOT by Polkadot governance participants.


Context of the proposal:

Probably one of the most-requested features is the ability to make Treasury proposals in stablecoins like USDT and USDC. This is for many reasons, including less volatility around Treasury proposals and preserving the value of the Polkadot Treasury to ensure funds are available to support a given budget in the future.

With the latest upgrades to Substrate and the Polkadot runtime, the Treasury has a lot more tools available to it for its management, including proposals with non-DOT assets like stablecoins.

As was done in referendum 457, this proposal is to convert 5,000,000 DOT to USDT and USDC over the course of the next year, with 50% going to each. This uses Hydration's DCA feature to convert a little bit each day and ensure a steady flow of stablecoins into the Treasury.

Unlike 457, this referendum sells a fixed amount of DOT per trade rather than acquiring a fixed amount of USDT/C. For better capital efficiency, the full amount of DOT will be also initially converted into aDOT (yield-bearing collateral token) and supplied into the Hydration Borrow feature. By doing so, the Polkadot Treasury will accumulate yield on the dormant DOT, while substantially increasing the DOT supply available for borrowing, thus enabling more DeFi use cases. More details can be found in this post.

Moreover it newly utilizes the “Rolling DCA” feature, which enables renewing the schedule just by sending DOT to the proxy account. This in turn means other governance tracks with lower security assumptions, such as Treasurer, can be used for smaller topups if needed.

This amount accounts for about 22% of the new DOT expected to be minted into the Treasury over the next year (this could vary based on variables like the staking rate).

Proposal objective(s) or solution(s):

The central proposition entails the creation of a schedule that converts DOT into USDT and USDC via the DCA feature on Hydration, a parachain on Polkadot.

The attributes of this proposal are:

  • Cost-efficiency (approx. 0.4% of the total amount)
  • No necessity to appoint curators who oversee and manage the process
  • Conversion is done in small amounts over a longer period which provides a hedge for price volatility and manipulation

DCA schedule parameters: [USDT]

  • Total duration with current EMA7 price: 365 days
  • Total amount: 2,500,000 DOT
  • Trade frequency: One trade every 20 blocks (approx. 4 minutes)
  • Per trade: 20 DOT
  • Per day: 7200 DOT
  • Send to asset hub after accumulating: 5,000 USDT
  • Total fee estimation: 0.4% of total amount acquired

DCA schedule parameters: [USDC]

  • Total duration with current EMA7 price: 365 days
  • Total amount: 2,500,000 DOT
  • Trade frequency: One trade every 20 blocks (approx. 4 minutes)
  • Per trade: 20 DOT
  • Per day: 7200 DOT
  • Send to asset hub after accumulating: 5,000 USDC
  • Total fee estimation: 0.4% of total amount acquired

Fee estimation breakdown:

  • Trade fee: 0.3% (0.25% to Liquidity Providers, 0.05% to the protocol)
  • Slippage fee: 0.045% (→AMM)
  • Transaction fee on Hydration: 0.035% (→Protocol treasury)
  • Transaction fee on Polkadot Asset Hub: 0.02% (→Asset Hub collators)

Note: Fees depend heavily on the schedule settings and are estimated based on parameters used. It is worth mentioning that the Hydration protocol also uses dynamic fees based on block space utilization ranging 0.15-5% to protect liquidity providers in times of volatility. All time average trade fees as of proposal submission are around 0.3%.

Description of steps utilizing XCM to achieve the solution:

  • Send 5,000,001DOT from the Polkadot treasury to the Pure Proxy account [7N4oFqXKgeTXo6CMSY9BVZdHP5J3RhQXY77Fe7qmQwjcxa1w] controlled exclusively by the relay chain sovereign account on Hydration [7KQx4f7yU3hqZHfvDVnSfe6mpgAT8Pxyr67LXHV6nsbZo3Tm]

  • After 1 block to process balance state changes on Hydration, schedule sending an XCM program to Transact on Hydration. This will initiate two DCA schedules, each with a total amount of 2,500,000 DOT, swapping 20 DOT to USDT and USDC every 20 blocks.

  • Once the first USDT chunk is accumulated, initiate a periodic schedule that sends cross-chain chunks of 5,000 USDT and 5,000 USDC from the Pure Proxy on Hydration to the General Treasury account on the Polkadot Asset Hub [14xmwinmCEz6oRrFdczHKqHgWNMiCysE2KrA4jXXAAM1Eogk], totaling to max. 27500 transactions.

Show More

Voting has Started

of 3

Decision Period
4/28 days

Confirmation Period
0/1 day

Summary
50%Aye
AyeNay
50%Nay
Ayes(27)
0.00 DOT
Nays(6)
0.00 DOT
Support
0.00 DOT
Voting Details
Approval0.00%Threshold0.00%
Support0.00%Threshold0.00%
Please Log In to comment
Users are saying...
Based on all comments and replies

Overall, 100% of users are critical. Concerns include the proposal's potential to undermine DOT's value through gradual selling, its reliance on centralized stablecoins, and risks tied to Hydration's fees and dependency. Critics argue this could harm DOT holders' confidence, introduce regulatory and counterparty risks, and overexpose the Treasury to DeFi-related volatility. Some suggest a more cautious, incremental approach to mitigate systemic risks.

AI-generated from comments

4Comments
33%
33%
33%
0%
0%
twskhuang
 
 
4 days ago

I have noticed that the current mechanism allows for circumventing the Treasury’s 1% burn every 24 days once again. Given this, have we ever considered increasing the burn rate to 2% or even higher to enhance efficiency?

Your insights on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Hide replies
rtti5220
 
 
4 days ago

@SK Hi! Back in 2024 there was a community discussion to modify Polkadot inflation parameters, with three options, and after the three options were submitted via governance vote. After the vote in November 2024, Polkadot transitioned from a model that led to exponential growth in the token supply (but with a constant inflation rate) to one with linear growth (with a decreasing inflation rate) (you can read more about it here).

As far as I remember, there were no changes on the burned supply on Polkadot (but I am checking and if I find something different I will follow up): however, take into account that payments for core sales is also burned now. This parameter was changed on Kusama, meaning that the burned supply percentage can also be changed via governance.

testest
 
 
3 days ago

Although the exchange is done slowly over a year, I understand that you are not optimistic about the future price of DOT, so you choose to sell it, which has hit the confidence of all DOT holders. If all DOT holders also sell DOT slowly like this to avoid risks, it will be a disaster for DOT.

realgar
 
 
2 days ago
Voted Nay

While acknowledging the laudable intent to protect the Treasury from volatility, the proposal introduces risks that are disproportionate to the expected benefits. Converting 5 million DOT into centralized stablecoins ties the fate of the Treasury to external entities (Tether, Circle) exposed to regulatory and counterparty risks, in stark contrast to the principles of sovereignty and decentralization on which Polkadot is built. The massive use of Hydration, while technically sophisticated, creates a critical dependency on a single rollup, while the deflationary impact on DOT — already subject to sell pressure from unlocks and inflation — could further undermine its usefulness as a central asset of the ecosystem. While we appreciate the innovation of DCA and yield-bearing aDOT, the scale of the operation is excessive for an experiment that is not yet validated. A gradual experimentation, with small amounts and safety clauses, would allow testing the model without exposing the Treasury to systemic consequences. Until these adjustments are integrated, voting ‘No’ is not a rejection of diversification, but an act of prudence to preserve the Treasury as a common good, not as collateral for DeFi bets. My judgment can vary in a positive direction provided that the risk and the burden that weighs on the community are highlighted, as well as that the role of the proponents is clarified because in my opinion the proponents could benefit directly (e.g. fees on Hydration, additional liquidity), while the stakers suffer the losses.

dashboard profile icon
joz
 
 
2 days ago

Buy high sell low, chaos dao and hydration biggest grifters after giotto left. Hydration gettin money through fee's and actin like it's good thing for Polkadot. No wonder DOT is s*it when noobs control opengov.

BIGGEST NO.


Discover similar proposals


#1465
openzeppelin
Deciding

OpenZeppelin Support for Polkadot Hub and Polkadot Cloud in 2025

Polkadot’s strategy in 2025 is driven by the release of a new EVM-compatible smart contract platform in Polkadot Hub as well as the continued evolution of Polkadot Cloud. As a follow on to the four OpenGov proposals OpenZeppelin completed in 2024 (1, 2, 3, 4), OpenZeppelin has been collaborating Parity to support the launch of Polkadot Hub in 2025 with developer enablement (Solidity contract libraries and tooling) and to continue to support Polkadot Cloud with iterative updates.

See More

1st Mar '25

Big Spender

Big Spender

#1465 OpenZeppelin Support for Polkadot Hub and Polkadot Cloud in 2025
openzeppelin
1st Mar '25

Polkadot’s strategy in 2025 is driven by the release of a new EVM-compatible smart contract platform in Polkadot Hub as well as the continued evolution of Polkadot Cloud. As a follow on to the four OpenGov proposals OpenZeppelin completed in 2024 (1, 2, 3, 4), OpenZeppelin has been collaborating Parity to support the launch of Polkadot Hub in 2025 with developer enablement (Solidity contract libraries and tooling) and to continue to support Polkadot Cloud with iterative updates.

OpenZeppelin brings a wealth of experience in developer enablement to the ecosystem, especially as Polkadot moves to target native Solidity developers and widely-used DeFi protocols for Polkadot Hub launch. Not only has OpenZeppelin has been the “point of entry” for many developers who are first learning smart contracts, who study OpenZeppelin’s contract libraries, such as the ERC20, ERC721, upgradeable, and so on, but OpenZeppelin contracts are the standard contracts that almost all protocols build upon:

  • $20 Trillion USD of total value has been transferred across OpenZeppelin contracts
  • Market Share of ~19% of all transactions on all chains
  • 100% penetration for OpenZeppelin contracts across top 50 DeFi protocols

OpenZeppelin is on the leading edge of a number of cross-ecosystem initiatives, including interop, privacy/ZK, and standards creation. Most recently, OpenZeppelin wrote and audited the flagship feature of Uniswap v4, the Hooks library, and is currently developing a based rollup stack with Taiko.

With this experience, OpenZeppelin can be a strong strategic partner to Parity and the broader Polkadot Ecosystem in their mission to launch a new platform and attract a new generation of developers with Polkadot Hub.

The collaboration has already started, and OpenZeppelin is currently working with Parity following the completion of the last treasury proposal. This proposal provides a context for the official working relationship over the next year.

Please see the full proposal here.

See More

Deciding
#1466
15PaZ_cQxr3
Deciding

Polkadot Cloud Website Development (Phase 1: Q2 2025)

Hello Polkadot community!

See More

polkadot
1st Mar '25
98%

Small Spender

Small Spender

#1466 Polkadot Cloud Website Development (Phase 1: Q2 2025)
15PaZ_cQxr3
1st Mar '25
98%

Hello Polkadot community!

We are pleased to propose the Polkadot Cloud Website Development Project, an initiative focused on developing a state-of-the-art platform showcasing the extensive suite of services offered by Polkadot Cloud (e.g., execution, settlement, data availability, object storage).

View full proposal

|624x511

Problem + Solution

Decentralized cloud platforms like Akash and Spheron are quickly gaining traction, while major incumbents like Google's Web3 Cloud Portal fail to mention Polkadot entirely. No dedicated, well-designed platform exists for developers or enterprises to explore Polkadot Cloud offerings, limiting visibility and adoption.

To maintain its competitive edge, Polkadot needs a dedicated website that clearly communicates its cloud infrastructure, capabilities, and advantages to developers, enterprises, and the broader Web3 ecosystem. With approval of this referendum, we will build a world-class digital presence that cements Polkadot's leadership in decentralized cloud solutions — ensuring Polkadot Cloud remains top of mind.

View full proposal

Why a Dedicated Cloud Website?

🔹 Enterprise Adoption – Attracts businesses & devs exploring Web3 cloud solutions.

🔹 Tangible Reality – Turns Polkadot Cloud from concept → real, actionable product.

🔹 Competitive Edge – Positions Polkadot as the leading decentralized cloud.

🔹 Decentralization – Reduces dependency on a single website/controller.

|624x312

View full proposal

What is Polkadot Cloud?

Polkadot Cloud is the next-gen decentralized cloud for Web3 builders—offering execution, settlement, data availability, object storage, and more to rival Web2 giants like AWS & Google Cloud. By leveraging the Polkadot Cloud, developers can deploy any Web3 application easily, affordably, and at scale.

🌐 Polkadot.cloud intends to serve as the official portal for:

✔️ Cloud services overview & enterprise case studies

✔️ Coretime/blockspace reservations

✔️ Performance metrics & comparisons

✔️ Enterprise/developer onboarding

To learn about the differences between Polkadot Cloud and Polkadot Hub, read the full proposal.

|624x312

Team & Support

👨‍💻 Flez (PM/Designer) – Polkadot UX Bounty Curator, Serial Founder, Designer @ flez.xyz

🛠️ Advisors: Ross & Joel – Official Polkadot Staking Dashboard team funded by OpenGov

👏 Liked by: Shawn T – Polkadot Lead Developer & original proposer of Cloud concept

❤️ Community rallying on X: Post teasing Polkadot Cloud project received well

View full proposal

Phase 1 Deliverables (MVP)

✅ Fully responsive, state-of-the-art website

✅ CMS for exploring Polkadot Cloud services

✅ Interactive performance charts showcasing tech capabilities

✅ Case studies per industry (e.g., Mythos, HydraDX, Phala)

✅ Coretime/blockspace access (via RegionX)

✅ Localization support

Sneak peek

💦 Splash Page Preview: Visit polkadot.cloud

|624x312

Why Now?

🔸 Buzz around Polkadot Cloud is growing rapidly—but no tangible offering exists today.

🔸 Google Cloud, AWS, etc are moving into Web3—but they aren't including Polkadot.

🔸 Akash & Spheron are gaining traction in the decentralized/web3 cloud space.

🔸 Polkadot Cloud needs a strong presence to defend its leadership position.

View full proposal

See More

Deciding
polkadot
#1472
TimPBA
Deciding

VOTE NAY! Polkadot Blockchain Academy, PBA Campus 7, The JAM Course launch, ...

*******VOTE NAY****** this proposal has been replaced by

See More

treasury
polkadot
+1
4th Mar '25
87%

Big Spender

Big Spender

#1472 VOTE NAY! Polkadot Blockchain Academy, PBA Campus 7, The JAM Course launch, ...
TimPBA
4th Mar '25
87%

*******VOTE NAY****** this proposal has been replaced by

https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1497

We are switching to USDT and a tranche based release schedule to help treasury cashflow

The Future of Polkadot Depends on Talent

The Polkadot Blockchain Academy (PBA) is the single largest and most effective pipeline of talent into the Polkadot ecosystem. Over the past three years, close to 750 learners have completed our courses, many of whom now produce significant contributions towards Polkadot or ecosystem projects.

We are at a pivotal moment. The future of Polkadot depends not just on innovation but on a steady stream of highly skilled, motivated builders who can create and execute impactful projects, advance the network's capabilities and drive adoption. The PBA has proven its ability to deliver, our alumni are shaping the ecosystem, and demand for our programs has never been higher.

To capitalize on this momentum, we are requesting nine months of funding to scale our programs and diversify our offerings, making PBA more inclusive, relevant and far-reaching than ever before.

Why support PBA? A Track Record of Success

  • We are the largest producer of well educated, Polkadot-native talent – No other initiative has onboarded more developers successfully.
  • Close to 70% of 409 PBA Campus graduates actively contributed to open-source Polkadot-related repositories in 2024.
  • Trusted by ecosystem leaders – Parity, The Web3 Foundation and other top teams recruit directly from our alumni.
  • Expanding accessibility – Our online course, PBA-X, launched in January with 580+ learners, and close to 60% completion rate, proving demand for remote education for a diverse audience.

Ongoing Evolution: Scaling & Strengthening Polkadot’s Talent Engine

With this funding, we will:

  • Expand PBA’s flagship in-person PBA Campus program (Wave 7) to train and place the next cohort of high-impact developers.
  • Launch The JAM Course, an intensive in person course demystifying Polkadot’s JAM protocol, for top-tier engineers from the Web3 community.
  • Grow university partnerships, integrating PBA content into curricula and securing the next generation of builders.
  • Enhance alumni engagement through ongoing participation orientated events, education, placement and mentorship opportunities.
  • Build upon the success of PBA-X to offer new content based on the needs of the ecosystem, whilst continuing to run the original PBA-X content for 5 more cohorts in 2025.
  • Continue to identify, mentor and funnel new projects into the ecosystem via the Pitch and Mentor program.

Polkadot’s growth depends on its builders. By funding PBA, we secure a sustainable, scalable pipeline of developers, entrepreneurs and advocates who will drive the ecosystem forward.

Follow the below link to find out more about our latest proposal; 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/11fKCbYG79VomgYFK4FDsK534ihmfSDG3wCnmLpo_kws/edit?tab=t.0

See More

Deciding
treasury
polkadot
+1