[Whitelisted Caller] Increase validator set size to 600
Whitelisted by: https://collectives.subsquare.io/fellowship/referenda/308.
This call increases the current validator set size from 500 to 600, this a followup of https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1200, that increased the validator set size from 400 to 500.
Following this change the maximum number of usable cores supported by polkadot will increase from 100(500 / 5) to 120 (600 / 5) where 5 is the dimension of a parachain backing group.
Testing
Kusama has been running with 600 parachain consensus validators since this referenda https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/484, on 2025-01-22.
Comments (3)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (67)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (1)0.0 DOT
Comments (3)
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our preliminary vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Head of Protocol Partnerships “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.
More validators means a more strong network. Nice =)
Is available documentation about the process an requirements to setup and request connection permission for one? Thanks
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our preliminary vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Head of Protocol Partnerships “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.