Polkadot/ Kusama Asset Hub Liquidity for Bridge Fee Swaps
KSM trading recently went live on Hydration after referendum #490
(https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/490) approved 33,333
KSM in Treasury LP. This has finally opened up liquidity flows between the two chains.
When transfers are made between the two using the Kusama <> Polkadot bridge, if a user does not have sufficient KSM/ DOT (depending on the chain) on the receiving network then a portion of the asset they’re sending (e.g. KSM from KAH to PAH) is swapped for the native token to pay for fees. This is excellent UX and prevents user frustration with having to collect fees before bridging assets - however, unfortunately the current liquidity leaves much to be desired and as a result users can get rekt by slippage and lose much larger amounts of their assets to fees than expected.
This proposal, if approved, will supply 1,000
DOT to a 2/2
multisig with signers Leemo & lolmcshizz - which combined with referendum #503
(https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/503) on Kusama for 333
KSM, and will be split between Kusama AssetHub and Polkadot AssetHub 50/50
to provide a base level of liquidity on each network. This will ensure that there is sufficient liquidity for these small swaps and users will only pay the fees they are expecting to when making transfers.
Any excess tokens will be returned to their respective treasuries.
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (33)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (0)0.0 PAS
Comments (2)
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our preliminary vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Head of Protocol Partnerships “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.
Great, aye!
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our preliminary vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Head of Protocol Partnerships “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.
Great, aye!