Dear Polkadot Frens: As many are aware, my good friends at&nbsp;Modern Market, BCheque and Legendary, have been tapped <a href="https://x.com/BCheque1/status/1876357466528550938" target="_blank" rel="noopener">to showcase parts of the Polkadot ecosystem</a> in a limited sponsorship via the Marketing Bounty.&nbsp; Many of you may also recall my attempt to lock them up for a 6 month headline sponsorship during the window of time when the old MB was defunct and the new one hadn't been set up (<a href="referenda/1085" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ref. 1085</a>). Since that point in October, the show has seen an explosion in growth, partly fueled by my friend and frequent contributor s4mmy.eth's relentless focus and research on the AI agent niche within the broader crypto market. I am undoubtely happy for both the&nbsp;Modern Market&nbsp;crew as well as the ecosystem to get some exposure through their show. I have told them I will help bring anyone from Polkadot to their Founder Friday interviews and otherwise remain a resource for them due to my daily appearance on the show as a regular panelist and occasional guest co-host duties. Having said that, and based on my past experience as a recruiter before joining Lucky Friday / Web3 full time ~ 2.5 years ago, I believe I deserve a small finder's fee for highlighing this talented team and introducing them to the ecosystem. The Marketing Bounty curators even went so far as to tell me that because of my introduction it made the vetting easy and they green lit them through the new agency that brought them (and others) to the MB. However, in the recruiting world, this is a massive no-no. If "candidates" are presented by other agencies (or individual recruiters), it is incumbent upon the client to return to the original recruiter to continue conversations with the candidate. Granted, I do not expect the curators to know or do this, but it definitely bothered me that I was cut out of the loop in this process and only informed after the fact. At the time of the original deal, I was only asking for a 5% (very, very low) commision, half of which I was willing to donate via Teddy DAO to a charity of the MM crew's collective choice. I am asking for a small tip to help rectify this situation, which is just over 10% of my original cut (had to go with the meme number). I believe this is more than resonable considering the circumstances, but happy to hear from others as to why this isn't deserved. Thank you in advance for your support! Gratefully, Ryan / Phunky&nbsp;

Propose and approve a spend of treasury funds.

## Dispatch Origin

Must be [`Config::SpendOrigin`] with the `Success` value being at least `amount`.

### Details
NOTE: For record-keeping purposes, the proposer is deemed to be equivalent to the
beneficiary.

### Parameters
- `amount`: The amount to be transferred from the treasury to the `beneficiary`.
- `beneficiary`: The destination account for the transfer.

## Events

Emits [`Event::SpendApproved`] if successful.

- **Problem Statement:** Ryan is requesting a finder's fee for introducing a talented team to the Polkadot ecosystem but feels cut out of the process and seeks acknowledgment for his contribution.
- **Significance:** Highlighting the importance of recognizing contributions in the recruiting process and the need for fair compensation for introductions.
- **Proposed Solution:** Requesting a small tip to rectify the situation, equivalent to just over 10% of the original commission.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Seeking acknowledgment and compensation for the role played in introducing the team to the ecosystem.

#1380 Modern Market Sponsorship Finder's Fee

No Active Proposals