<h3 id="tldr">tl;dr</h3>
<p>The preimage for <a href="1303">Ref. 1303</a> was pulled during confirmation to avoid payout of AssetHub assets to a Relay Chain Proxy.</p>
<p>This ref intends to rectify the payout approved by Ref. 1303.</p>
<p>Full explanation as well as the original Ref can be found <a href="1303">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 id="qwhatwastheproblem">Q: What was the problem?</h3>
<p>A: A Relay Chain Proxy as beneficiary of Asset Hub assets would mean the assets were inaccessible. Jay Chrawnna has <a href="https://x.com/GldnCalf/status/1867765364295446963">committed seppuku</a> for the error.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 id="qproofthepreimagewaspulled">Q: Proof the Preimage was Pulled?</h3>
<p>A: You can verify it <a href="https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xec8ca6dbcfee1b25201b9e95b61e6eb890f7eee9d4f21aee060da7005d79c42c">here</a> - pulled hours before the end of the confirmation period.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 id="qwhynotwaituntilpureproxyreplicationisimplemented">Q: Why not wait until Pure Proxy Replication is implemented?</h3>
<p>A: <a href="https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/111">Pure Proxy Replication</a> will solve this UX issue however it is unlikely to reach prod for many months which would render the assets useless until then.</p>
<h3>&nbsp;</h3>
<h3 id="qwhynotsubmitrootreftoreplicateproxy">Q: Why not submit Root Ref to Replicate Proxy?</h3>
<p>A: While such a ref has recently been submitted for <a href="https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1308">several other projects</a> caught in this UX snare, we decided it would be unwise to tie the root track for a single instance. It would also take months during which time the assets would be useless.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="yourvotewillacceleratetherectificationofthispayoutpreviouslyapprovedthankyouforthesupport">Your vote will accelerate the rectification of this payout previously approved. Thank you for the support! ❤️🤖</h2>

Propose and approve a spend of treasury funds.

## Dispatch Origin

Must be [`Config::SpendOrigin`] with the `Success` value being at least
`amount` of `asset_kind` in the native asset. The amount of `asset_kind` is converted
for assertion using the [`Config::BalanceConverter`].

## Details

Create an approved spend for transferring a specific `amount` of `asset_kind` to a
designated beneficiary. The spend must be claimed using the `payout` dispatchable within
the [`Config::PayoutPeriod`].

### Parameters
- `asset_kind`: An indicator of the specific asset class to be spent.
- `amount`: The amount to be transferred from the treasury to the `beneficiary`.
- `beneficiary`: The beneficiary of the spend.
- `valid_from`: The block number from which the spend can be claimed. It can refer to
  the past if the resulting spend has not yet expired according to the
  [`Config::PayoutPeriod`]. If `None`, the spend can be claimed immediately after
  approval.

## Events

Emits [`Event::AssetSpendApproved`] if successful.

- **Problem Statement:** The preimage for Ref. 1303 was pulled to prevent the payout of AssetHub assets to a Relay Chain Proxy, causing inaccessibility of the assets.
- **Significance:** Rectifying the payout approved by Ref. 1303 is crucial to avoid assets becoming useless.
- **Proposed Solution:** Accelerate the rectification of the payout by voting on the referendum.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Preventing assets from being inaccessible and ensuring their proper utilization.

#1353 Ratify Payout APPROVED by Ref. 1303 - The Kus

No Active Proposals