Vote Nay - Maintenance for the substrate-api-client Jan-25 to Jun-25
Beneficiary:Based on the feedback to this proposal, we created a new proposal asking for USDT:
https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1355
Please vote NAY on this one
Comments (3)
Proposal Failed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (39)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (48)0.0 PAS
Comments (3)
Hello. Thank you for posting this discussion post. Could you ask for stablecoins (USDT/USDC) instead of DOT?
Lucky Friday would like to provide the following feedback from our team members. We have been specifically solicited to provide feedback on this particular referendum, collectively offering it and hope that it will help the proposer(s) of this referendum moving forward. As noted previously, we have unanimously voted NAY.
The reason is simple and quite clear: it does not conform to our voting philosophy in following the broad social consensus in asking for stable coins, as noted HERE.
Should this ref fail and be resubmitted asking for USDT or USDC, we will happily support the future refendum.
Lucky Friday votes as a collective based on the results of our internal voting procedures and enacted on chain via the OpenGov server bot. No single team member is required to provide any feedback about why he or she has voted in a particular direction, although it is highly encouraged and happens often. With respect to our team members' right to anonymity and the private format in which we conduct our votes, we will not be sharing the names of individuals who have chosen to provide said feedback.
We encourage all members of the Polkadot community to join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Hello. Thank you for posting this discussion post. Could you ask for stablecoins (USDT/USDC) instead of DOT?
Lucky Friday would like to provide the following feedback from our team members. We have been specifically solicited to provide feedback on this particular referendum, collectively offering it and hope that it will help the proposer(s) of this referendum moving forward. As noted previously, we have unanimously voted NAY.
The reason is simple and quite clear: it does not conform to our voting philosophy in following the broad social consensus in asking for stable coins, as noted HERE.
Should this ref fail and be resubmitted asking for USDT or USDC, we will happily support the future refendum.
Lucky Friday votes as a collective based on the results of our internal voting procedures and enacted on chain via the OpenGov server bot. No single team member is required to provide any feedback about why he or she has voted in a particular direction, although it is highly encouraged and happens often. With respect to our team members' right to anonymity and the private format in which we conduct our votes, we will not be sharing the names of individuals who have chosen to provide said feedback.
We encourage all members of the Polkadot community to join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx