OpenZeppelin x Polkadot Ecosystem Growth Phase M4
a year ago
opensource
runtime
infrastructure
treasury
parachain
Rejected
This proposal is the fourth of our quarterly submissions by OpenZeppelin to accelerate the development and deployment of secure parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem. Since our last approval in July 2024, we have achieved:
- The launch of an EVM Runtime Template configured with Frontier pallets to support Solidity smart contracts seamlessly on Substrate chains.
- A detailed developer guide to assist in migrating Solidity contracts from Ethereum to our EVM runtime template.
- Collaboration with R0gue to integrate Pop CLI with our templates to give developers an even easier experience.
- Account abstraction support and pre-deployed contracts.
In this fourth phase (M4) we request the funding to:
- Meta Pallets: Streamline developer experience by creating higher-level, opinionated "meta pallets" that encapsulate common pallet functionalities. This reduces the number of pallets required for a project, simplifying development and accelerating time-to-market.
- Tanssi Integration: Enhance developer experience and increase parachain launch time by making our templates compatible with Tanssi.
- Zombienet-sdk improvements: One issue we’ve faced when writing integration tests is being able to easily spin up a local chain and tear it up. After speaking with some teams we realized this is a common problem across the ecosystem, that’s why we are collaborating with Parity to improve DX for zombienet by contributing upstream. An initial iteration for this design can be found here.
- Snowbridge Integration: Snowbridge is a general purpose, trustless and decentralized bridge between Polkadot and Ethereum. Our goal is to include out of the box support for parachains that use our templates.
- Developer guides detailing the use of Meta Pallets and all new features.
We aim to maintain transparent progress and welcome community feedback to strengthen the Polkadot network.
Comments (4)
Requested

62.91K DOT
Proposal Failed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (90)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (23)0.0 DOT
I really like the work that you are doing, but can you ask in USDC / USDT?
@wario
Thank you for your comment and for the support! I’m Nico from Parity, and while I’m not part of the OZ team that submitted this proposal, I’ve been advocating for their work. I agree with your suggestion to consider payments in USDT/USDC. However, since this proposal has already been submitted with a DOT ask and there was no discussion about alternative currencies during the discussion phase, I believe it’s best to proceed as planned.
For future proposals, I'll definitely encourage the OZ team to consider USDT/USDC for payments to better align with preferences. Thanks again for your input!
I support all the hard work OpenZeppelin has done.
Can this and future treasury requests be in stables ( USDC/USDT) instead of DOT?
@Christian123 Thanks for the suggestion! As already mentioned to Wario above, I think the OZ team will be happy to consider future requests in USDT/USDC :)