The Polkadot Ambassador program, established under Referendum 487 (<a href="487">https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/487</a>)&nbsp;has faced significant challenges since its inception. Concerns have been raised about the voting process, where a major voter approved all applicants without thorough evaluation. This has led to questions about the authenticity of some candidates and the due diligence performed in selecting Head Ambassadors. This is most evident in the fact that Michiko was elected as a Head Ambassador and later turned out to be a fake persona.
It is recommended that the entire program be reconsidered, modified, and subjected to a new vote.
Furthermore, there appears to be confusion among some Head Ambassadors about how Polkadot OpenGov works, including misunderstandings about tracks, voting mechanisms, and the nature of permissionless networks.

Send a batch of dispatch calls.
Unlike `batch`, it allows errors and won't interrupt.

May be called from any origin except `None`.

- `calls`: The calls to be dispatched from the same origin. The number of call must not
  exceed the constant: `batched_calls_limit` (available in constant metadata).

If origin is root then the calls are dispatch without checking origin filter. (This
includes bypassing `frame_system::Config::BaseCallFilter`).

## Complexity
- O(C) where C is the number of calls to be batched.

- **Problem Statement:** Lack of transparency and due diligence in the Polkadot Ambassador program's voting process.
- **Significance:** Authenticity concerns with selected Head Ambassadors, including instances of fake personas.
- **Proposed Solution:** Reconsider and modify the Ambassador program, subjecting it to a new vote.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Improved transparency, better selection process, and enhanced understanding of Polkadot OpenGov among Head Ambassadors.

#1195 Remove all 20 Head Ambassadors and remove the Ambassador Collective

No Active Proposals