View All Referendum Canceller

Canceling referendum 1186

inReferendum Canceller
a year ago
Rejected

Ambassador program in its current format was approved with root referendum especially the number of 21 ambassadors. If you want to reduce the number of ambassadors you should either go on root or WFC. This is not the correct track

Comments (6)

a year ago

Considering

  1. The track "FellowshipAdmin" is defined as "Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship." in code, wiki, and gov portals
  2. The remark in 1186 asks to "Set the max member count for Head Ambassadors in the Ambassador Collective to 10", which directly relates to the composition of the Fellowship in question.
  3. Additionally, no on-chain agreement or consensus states that such changes must go through Root or WFC. Compare this summary of existing Polkadot legislation. It should rather be assumed that plausible tracks are chosen. Fellowship Admin is a plausible track for administrating fellowships/collectives.

It follows that the claim of the current proposal 1188 is invalid and should thus be rejected.

a year ago

@Alice und Bob

Maybe it's the right track but it still should be cancelled for the bad intentions behind it, trying to eliminate community vote by proposing to remove ELECTED HAs based on a single/small group of people preference.

If this proposal was with good intentions, it would just ask to vote again on NEW top 10 HAs and let the COMMUNITY DECIDE who it should be, but it didn't. It tried to bypass it with this proposal and therefore should be cancelled imho.

a year ago

Michiko-san complains that people don't follow the rules :)

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Failed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (10)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (40)0.0 DOT

    Polkassembly - Referendum #1188