As Events Bounty Curators, we find it necessary to provide feedback on this proposal, as we believe it could be a good fit for the Events Bounty but now lacks some crucial elements, which we have outlined below:

• The current submission reads more like an ad for the Hack Seasons event rather than a structured proposal. It should clearly outline the strategic value of Polkadot’s participation and how it aligns with the broader goals of the ecosystem. The focus should be on the "why" and "how" rather than just the "what."
• Proposing an initiative of this scale requires a dedicated and pre-assembled team with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. The proposal should include detailed information about the team members who will execute this, their qualifications, and how they plan to ensure the success of Polkadot’s participation.
• There is a complete lack of a detailed budget breakdown, which is essential when requesting funding. The proposal fails to justify how the requested funds will be spent, leaving questions about the effective use of resources and the overall financial management.
• The proposal fails to articulate clear objectives or the specific outcomes expected from Polkadot’s participation in Hack Seasons. It is crucial to define what success will look like, how it will be measured, and how it will benefit Polkadot and its community.

remember the decision deposit