Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
Chat with KlaraComing Soon
OpenGov
View All Treasurer

Bounty Cleanup

inTreasurer
a year ago
Executed

GM,
the following bounties have various issues associated with them and should be closed.

Bounty #30 - “NacionCrypto” Establishment of Study Group and Development of Technical and Non-Technical Content.

  • This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.

Bounty #41 - Marketing Bounty Flex - VOTE NAY

  • This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #515

Bounty #45 - one

  • This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
  • This bounty never had any scope associated with it and is an error.

Bounty #47 - DED Bounty

  • This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #556

Bounty #48 - Lawsuit against Giotto De Filippi

  • This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.

Bounty #51 - Ecosystem Test Environment Bounty

  • This bounty was funded via referendum #832 but it was recently stated by Anaelle LTD | Ecosystem that this bounty should be closed as the scope of this bounty is now directly funded by the Polkadot Technical Fellowship.

Bounty #53 - Test Bounty

  • This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
  • This bounty never had any scope associated with it and was posted as a test.

Bounty #54 - Dot Play Bounty

  • This bounty was never funded and the scope and curators of the Games Bounty were changed and effectively became what bounty 54 was attempting to be,

Bounties 55, 56 - Test Bounties

  • These bounties were never funded and are effectively inactive.
  • These bounties never had any scope associated with them and were posted as a test.

Bounty 57 - Polkadot cafe/coworking proposal

  • This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #1009

Bounty 58 - DotSama marathon for education

  • This bounty is effectively a marketing proposal for an individual and it is not an appropriate use of bounties.

Cheers,

Leemo 🍻

Comments (2)

a year ago

Excellent Leemo, do you know the status of bounties 27, 38, 39, and 44?

a year ago

@Lily_Mendz 

Hello,
sure let's have a quick look, bare in mind I was just going for the low hanging fruit at the time on a Saturday night and anything that looked remotely active, etc. I left off the list.

Bounty 27 – Polkadot Parachain Assets Onramp Bounty Program

  • With this one you are probably right, it seems inactive and probably the scope of this referendum is covered by work done in Bounty 36

Bounty 38 – Games Bounty

  • I can see why you listed this one, as it hasn't had much activity (or any really)
  • The curators for this bounty were changed semi recently, this might have caused some issues with any operations
  • Just because a bounty hasn't been able to find any product/service to pay funds to doesn't mean it's inactive
  • Recently Polkadot Referendum #990 was adjusting the scope of this Bounty
  • We can of course ask Nick / Angie etc about the status of this bounty and what they are working on

Bounty 39 - BD Bounty

  • There was a recent child bounty created under this bounty so I suppose it's active
  • It's another case like Bounty 38 where probably the curators need to give us all a status as to the operations of the bounty (what they are working on etc), the best place is to post an update under the Polkassembly page
  • You can find the curator list here, if you want to also ask them for an update:
    • Pure Proxy that is the on-chain curator: https://polkadot.subscan.io/account/14Go2ZU3TyYt4J6SALemRkrYppoT8uqvPdiszZze1FtynfbS
    • Multisig members of the Any Proxy controlling that Pure Proxy: https://polkadot.subscan.io/multisig_member_account?address=161rkHJmPTrfEdeYRKpfW5CxJz9n4MggaT4bqz562dzJ1XCT

Bounty 44 - POLKADOT <> KUSAMA BRIDGE SECURITY BOUNTY

  • I think this is a rather important Bounty which really won't be that active in paying out child bounties, the only reason they would is to pay out bug bounties afaik
  • It would indeed be good, like with the previous ones, to provide some form of update for the community on Polkassembly
  • You can find the Curator list here: https://polkadot.subscan.io/multisig_member_account?address=12niVg1BaFNjWDgtsneoiUQqZ1KB6YBGG68JLrNomYScckrQ

Overall like I've said in many cases in various channels, on X, and on AAG transparency (and providing updates) across the board in our eco is important, people need to communicate more.

a year ago

Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx

Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Director of Protocol Relations “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (105)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (2)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy