Bounty Cleanup
GM,
the following bounties have various issues associated with them and should be closed.
Bounty #30 - “NacionCrypto” Establishment of Study Group and Development of Technical and Non-Technical Content.
- This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
Bounty #41 - Marketing Bounty Flex - VOTE NAY
- This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #515
Bounty #45 - one
- This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
- This bounty never had any scope associated with it and is an error.
Bounty #47 - DED Bounty
- This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #556
Bounty #48 - Lawsuit against Giotto De Filippi
- This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
Bounty #51 - Ecosystem Test Environment Bounty
- This bounty was funded via referendum #832 but it was recently stated by Anaelle LTD | Ecosystem that this bounty should be closed as the scope of this bounty is now directly funded by the Polkadot Technical Fellowship.
Bounty #53 - Test Bounty
- This bounty was never funded and is effectively inactive.
- This bounty never had any scope associated with it and was posted as a test.
Bounty #54 - Dot Play Bounty
- This bounty was never funded and the scope and curators of the Games Bounty were changed and effectively became what bounty 54 was attempting to be,
Bounties 55, 56 - Test Bounties
- These bounties were never funded and are effectively inactive.
- These bounties never had any scope associated with them and were posted as a test.
Bounty 57 - Polkadot cafe/coworking proposal
- This bounty was never funded and was rejected via referendum #1009
Bounty 58 - DotSama marathon for education
- This bounty is effectively a marketing proposal for an individual and it is not an appropriate use of bounties.
Cheers,
Leemo 🍻
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (105)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (2)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Comments (2)
Excellent Leemo, do you know the status of bounties 27, 38, 39, and 44?
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Director of Protocol Relations “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.
Excellent Leemo, do you know the status of bounties 27, 38, 39, and 44?
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Director of Protocol Relations “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.