Multiple end user stories of trying to nominate with a stake account value of less than 200 DOT. When this happens, the value gets bonded before they are made aware that not only is their staked DOT not going to receive rewards but also the need to wait for 28 days for unbonding to complete. 

I propose the following:

Split bonding functions based on use case. Governance bonding and Economic bonding. 

Change to Economic bonding is either to prevent bonding on accounts with less than 200 DOT or to remove the 28 day unbonding period requirement. 

Governance bonding would remain as it is today. 

- Some people are trying to nominate with less than 200 DOT, but they are not getting rewards and have to wait a long time to get their money back.
- One idea is to separate bonding into two categories: Governance bonding and Economic bonding.
- For Economic bonding, either people with less than 200 DOT should not be allowed to bond or the 28-day waiting period should be removed.
- Governance bonding would stay the same.
- In short, people with less than 200 DOT should not be allowed to bond or have to wait a long time to get their money back.

#363 Minimum thresholds, bonding for Governance and Economy

No Active Proposals