**Tip to Anaelle LTD for the creation of Bounties HR and Bounties Staff databases**
This is a request for a retroactive tip totalling $2,125 ($85 x 25 hours) for the time Anaelle LTD spent structuring, populating, and updating 2 databases hosted at OpenGov HR:
-
Bounties HR: An overview of Bounties staff and salary schemes. (17 hours)
-
Bounties Staff: A summary of Bounties staff’ professional experience and affiliated organisations. (8 hours)
This retroactive proposal was previously announced in the original Polkadot forum post.
The on-chain proposal will be made for payment in USDC.
Comments (4)
Comments (4)
FYI, this data is not accurate:
There are a bunch of people missing from this list (including me) and others who are no longer in the eco (like Giotto) It is also not representative of how many roles people have currently.
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Tipper track requires 35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received four aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The voters expressed unanimous support for the referendum, highlighting the reasonable amount proposed for valuable work. They appreciated the involvement of a trusted actor in the ecosystem, emphasizing that the compensation was fair and justified for the quality of work being recognized. Overall, the comments reflected a consensus on the importance of rewarding contributions that enhance the community.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
FYI, this data is not accurate:
There are a bunch of people missing from this list (including me) and others who are no longer in the eco (like Giotto) It is also not representative of how many roles people have currently.
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Tipper track requires 35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received four aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO