It seems like this bounty doesn't have neither proactive activity nor reactive activity as there is only one child bounty granted.
<a href="https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/49">https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/49</a>
<a href="https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/child-bounties/49_2672">https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/child-bounties/49_2672</a>
This bounty was meant to be proactive and reward developers envolved in BD pushes and other technical efforts but in 8 months it's had no activity. We would like to hear if there are parties interested in the funds of this bounty because as of now all active BD efforts don't depend on it as they are working in parallel and with more specific goals as well as geographically specific objectives. Otherwise, we'd like to hear if there are grounds for closing this bounty due to inactivity and lack of impact on BD efforts. A poll is included on this discussion, Voting AYE means closing the bounty NAY, means leaving it active but more than anything, we would like to hear the reasons why this bounty should or shouldn't be closed.
Let's kickstart the discussion.

- **Problem Statement:** Lack of activity and impact in a proactive bounty meant for rewarding developers involved in business development (BD) efforts.
- **Significance:** The bounty has had minimal activity in 8 months, raising questions about its relevance and impact on BD initiatives.
- **Proposed Solution:** Discussing potential interest in the funds, considering closing the bounty due to inactivity, and gathering opinions on whether it should remain active.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Clarification on the future of the bounty based on community feedback and potential redirection of funds towards more impactful BD initiatives.

#2630 Closing Bounty 49. Technical Support Bounty.

No Active Proposals