Propose to revamp Polkadot BD Bounty with New Curator Set and Structure
We are proposing a new list of BD Bounty Curators who are reputable contributors to the Polkadot ecosystem and are currently aggressively contributing to Business and growth related activities of Polkadot within their various roles and mandates. All curators in this new list are those who have already been committing their time to contribute to the success of Polkadot and its ecosystem, either as part of teams building on Polkadot, to collectives or to Decentralized Voice or Futures Program led by Web3 Foundation.
CHECK FULL PROPOSAL HERE
MAIN PROBLEMS
The BD Bounty was initially conceived as a volunteer-based initiative, requiring no operational expenses. This approach, however, led to a lack of sustained commitment from some members, likely due to the time-intensive nature of the role.
The BD Bounty was established with a relatively short planning period, resulting in a lack of detailed operational guidelines or clearly defined responsibilities for curators.
Business development is a critical function within the Polkadot ecosystem at its current stage. The presence of numerous inactive curators poses a significant challenge to the effective advancement of this vital area.
SOLUTION
- Reduce the curator set from 11 to 5 and introduce new curators from the Polkadot ecosystem who have specific expertise and a network.
- Introduce appropriate financial incentives for these curators and task them with dedicated responsibilities in order to increase efficiency and decision making to maximize results.
- Implement a dismiss mechanism for curators who neglect their duties and do not actively contribute to their role.
- Implement a new Multisig with a proxy set-up Implement a transparent and systematic operation flow for BD Bounty between curators and proposers.
- Monthly Office Hours with a potential Livestream Setup on BD initiatives.
- Coordinate with other ecosystem bounties and DF teams to share information related to deals and opportunities which can benefit the ecosystem.
- Set up a milestone-based incentives system for qualified proposals.
GOALS OF THE BOUNTY
- Identify and secure partnerships between Polkadot projects and businesses to enhance ecosystem collaboration.
- Promote initiatives that facilitate the integration of external applications and services within Polkadot and with existing teams.
- Build a network of business deal finders (introducers) who can connect Polkadot projects with potential clients, partners, and capital allocators.
- Provide resources and support to help business deal finders navigate the integration process and close deals effectively.
- Establish reward mechanisms for deal finders who successfully facilitate integrations that result in tangible benefits for the ecosystem.
- Promote partnerships across various industries to demonstrate the versatility of the Polkadot ecosystem.
- Develop strategies to encourage the adoption of Polkadot-based solutions among businesses and end-users.
- Create mechanisms for ongoing feedback from businesses and deal finders to continuously improve the bounty program and ecosystem offerings.
NEW OPERATION STRUCTURE
PROPOSING CURATOR FEE (FOR DISCUSSION)
This is for roles with commitment of at least 8 hours/week (Still in discussion before finalizing) Option 1: Curators, General Manager: 3,000 USD/month (for part-time job)
Option 2: Curators, General Manager: 2,000 USD/month + a bonus of 5% of any compensation earned by BD proposals that they brought to the bounty (this is another payment from the bounty, it is not taken out of the BDers compensation).
Note: We are open for discussion on these options and will finalize when we post the proposal on-chain.
Technical Implementer: 50 USD/hour (depending on workload)
Dismissal
If the curators neglect their duties they will be eliminated by the strike system, voted out or instructed to step down.
The demotion will be considered by two main factors:
- The efficiency of the general bounty.
- The contribution of an individual curator.
The curator set has the responsibility to point out the lack of contribution and propose a vote based on the efficiency of the bounty.
CHECK FULL PROPOSAL HERE
- You Can Expect:
- Why we propose a new change?
- List of new curators (diversify in different regions).
- General Responsibilities
- Application Tracks (IMPORTANT)
- How we will incentivize BDers?
- Timeline to proceed and ship the bounty.
Comments (4)
Thank you for submitting this discussion post. Here is some feedback/comments:
"Reduce the curator set from 11 to 5 and introduce new curators from the Polkadot ecosystem who have specific expertise and a network." --> I agree with this, 5 curators is more than enough.
"Implement a dismiss mechanism for curators who neglect their duties and do not actively contribute to their role." --> This is also a good idea because it makes removing curators who are not doing what they should be doing easier.
What are some of the business-related expenses that BD agents incur that the BD Bounty could cover? This was one of the critical missing pieces before. I agree with rewarding people by bringing them to Polkadot, but some deals can take a long time to close. For example, if someone wants to travel to meet the CEO of a company to onboard them into Polkadot ( get the CEO to integrate Polkdot technology into their business), can those travel expenses be covered by the BD Bounty ( for sure, there will be limits)? I know there can be synergies with other bounties for this, but I think the BD bounty can play a key role.
I'm glad you opened this discussion; I have some comments on the proposal. I would like to see specific objectives, such as achieving a certain number of partnerships with companies in the sector—something more concrete. The proposed structure feels more similar to the marketing bounty, where many proposals can be received, but how many of them would truly benefit the ecosystem? (I hope I'm making sense with my imperfect English here.)
Maybe something more akin to tenders would work better, where the Bounty could announce that it is looking to establish business relationships in a specific area, and then open calls for tenders to select the best proposals. From my perspective, this approach might help the Bounty focus on one goal at a time, making it more successful.
I also see that Albert Burgos is listed as a curator. Should I assume that the BD Polkadot in Spain & Andorra initiative will be part of this Bounty?