View All Discussion
Ambassador program 2.0: rebuilding from scratch the ambassador program
Giotto
a year ago
The purpose of this referendum is to prevent the integration of the ambassador collective onchain. The idea is to completely restructure the ambassador program with proper incentives. Almost everyone agrees that the program is a failure and is completely ineffective. Funding something ineffective will make it even more ineffective. It has to be completely restructed first. The first step is to ensure that the ambassador collective does not go on chain Poll: https://t.me/dotxpert/835
Comments (3)
I don't understand the point of this. It needs a root-referendum to go on-chain. If you don't want that referendum to pass, then vote/advocate against it if/when it comes up. This is like, "let's have a referendum to keep the status quo." Passing this referendum seems completely meaningless and a waste of the opportunity cost of a 100k decision deposit. If you think the program is ineffective and/or needs restructuring, then help restructure it or propose alternatives.
We agreed to propose to restructure on the Telegram group, but this needs to be confirmed first of all by the Polkadot community and also the Ambassadors.
Saying the "the program is a failure" feels very exaggerated, so please have a look at some of the contributions of Senior and Head Ambassadors here:
https://ipfs.filebase.io/ipfs/QmQ5Mr5gEguVX9FajCwnxgLokXVu7RNLeqGuYBLceYRD1N
I propose collecting the needs and what the community wants to see from Ambassadors and reiterate current document, which is this one.