Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more
Polkadot Community Grants Program through Delegated Domain Capital Allocation
Summary
- We propose that Polkadot launch a community grants program of $1.85M spread across 2 quarters to fund a wide variety of teams building apps on top of Polkadot in a transparent manner. Questbook is leading Compound and Arbitrum grants program through delegated domain capital allocation model , a community run grants program.
- We additionally propose that this budget be managed by 4 individuals called D_omain Allocators._ These domain allocators would manage grants for a domain. These domains are strategic areas of focus for which the foundation wants to disburse grants
- The performance of each of these domain allocators will be publicly viewable and auditable using rich dashboards. At the end of every quarter, the Polkadot community can vote to replace, continue domain allocators or increase budgets for each domain allocator.
- We Questbook will help facilitate setting up these domain allocators and provide the tooling to run the grants program in an efficient and transparent way. We have previously set up or currently setting up the grants process for Arbitrum, Compound, Polygon, Solana, Celo, and Aave.
Motivation
As we continue to experience the depth of the bear market, it is increasingly important for Polkadot to retain the mindshare of key ecosystem contributors and incentivise builders to build on top of it. Polkadot serves as a foundational layer of a decentralised web, enabling users to control their data and not be limited by trust bounds within the network. A community run grants program is a great way to attract high-quality builders, develop homegrown leadership for running and scaling grants program and grow the ecosystem more quickly. By leveraging Delegating Domain Capital Allocation Model, Polkadot will be able to strike a balance between speed and decentralisation in funding high-quality proposals in a transparent manner. This proposal details the benefit to all the stakeholders involved - token holders, builders and DAO members.
Rationale (Benefits to Polkadot)
Giving the elected domain allocators the capital and decision-making powers will increase the efficiency of the grants program, without compromising on accountability:
- Individual expertise instead of collective blindspots
- Distributed load instead of committee backlogs
- Accountability instead of diffusion of responsibility
The proposed structure will lead to the following outcomes:
- Increase in quality proposals - Measured by the number of proposals received per month and % of proposals accepted by the domain allocators. Questbook is a desired destination for 20,000+ builders each month. We also have a dedicated team who is responsible for builder sourcing, engagement and reviewing draft proposals before they are submitted to ensure high quality.
- Aligned allocation of funds: By leveraging the Delegated Domain Allocator (DDA) model, Polkadot ecosystem will be able to ensure that funds are allocated to projects that align with the domain (selected by the Polkadot community), promoting efficient and effective use of resources. This approach aligns with Polkadot’s goal of enabling the distribution of grants and empower the community to build and participate in the future of the Polkadot while minimising bureaucracy.
- Increased transparency: The Delegated Domain Allocator approach provides a clear and transparent process for allocating funds, ensuring stakeholders understand the decision-making process and building community confidence. Questbook, a decentralized grant management platform, provides a transparent space for teams to showcase their backgrounds and experience. In addition, Questbook’s reporting features will allow Polkadot to quickly generate monthly reports on the allocation of funds, with the details for each grant proposal.
- Increased accountability: With a dedicated group of stakeholders responsible for allocating funds, the Delegated Domain Allocator approach promotes increased accountability, ensuring that the funds are used effectively and efficiently. Domain allocators can be replaced through a community vote if their performance is not up to the standards accepted by the community.
- Lower Turnaround Time (TAT): The Delegated Domain Capital Allocation model will help improve proposals’ turnaround time and overall outcomes for the ecosystem. An example of this is Compound who’s already leveraging the DDA model and has a communication TAT of less than 48 hours. The performance of domain allocators will be measured using objectives and key results (OKRs) to ensure goals are achieved efficiently and effectively.
- High Brand Recognition : The Delegated Domain Allocator model will play a crucial role in boosting developer engagement with Polkadot, as well as forming strategic partnerships with important ecosystems to jointly fund grants in mutually beneficial areas.
Program Design
The program structure focuses on having community members as domain allocators. Polkadot community will be required to set a budget of $1.85M to be disbursed by 4 domain allocators. Each domain allocator will be an expert in their specific domain and will run their domain on-chain for full transparency. The data and performance across key metrics will be visible to the community in order to evaluate the domain allocator’s performance.
The disbursement of the grant will take place on-chain from a multi-sig wallet controlled by the program manager & the domain allocator. The domain allocator will approve or reject proposals based on their evaluation. The program manager will then coordinate with the Polkadot community to ensure that the proposal is aligned with Polkadot ecosystem growth before signing the disbursal. The sole purpose of the multi-sig is to make sure capital is not being siphoned. However, the allocators are encouraged to make independent decisions regarding the approval of the proposal based on their expertise.
Every quarter, the grants committee and the Polkadot community shall evaluate the performance of each domain using publicly available data. The outcomes could be as follows:
- Change the domain
- Change the allocator/program manager
- Change the budget
Active community members can also initiate a no-confidence motion to initiate a review off-cycle. This can be initiated by one of the active delegates on Snapshot. The program manager can coordinate this, if the situation arises, along with the active community members. The unused funds from every domain will be returned to the treasury at the end of 2 quarters.
Product Screens
Invite proposals to your grants program 
Anyone from the community can view and comment on the proposals 
Invite community members to review proposals based on an evaluation rubric 
Make milestone-based payouts directly from the multi-sig 
Track the performance of the grants program 
Polkadot Grants Committee
The program will consist of
- A Program Manager
- 4 Domain Allocators
A Grants multi-sig wallet, with 4/5 signer authority, between the program manager and 4 domain allocators will be setup. We will then have 4 multi-sig wallets for each of the domains with a 2/2 signing power between the program manager and the specific domain allocator.
The funds for the grants program will flow from the treasury into the Grants multi-sig. This multi-sig wallet will hold the funds related to the grants budget and committee compensation. Funds that will be disbursed to the proposers will reside in the domain-level multi-sig wallet. The program manager will be responsible to update the community about approved proposals and their details through bi-weekly community calls and reports over discord.
We have identified the following domains based on our research and the feedback from the Polkadot team and community. We invite delegates and community members to self nominate themselves.
| Domain | Credentials Needed | Why it is relevant |
|---|---|---|
| Chains and Pallets | Experience in Core Protocol development | This will help Polkadot encourage more developers to create innovative bridges, zkp solutions, experiences and thus onboard new users to its ecosystem |
| Developer tooling on Substrate | Core contributor to Polkadot and popular L1s in Web 3 | This will help Polkadot build essential infrastructure, tooling for Substrate. |
| New Protocol Dapps and Ideas | Core contributor to Polkadot protocol | This will encourage more contributors to propose and run experiments for improving the Polkadot protocol |
| Education, Community growth and events | Experience in builder community growth and technical bootcamps | This will help Polkadot attract quality builders through community growth activities such as education courses, bootcamps, hackathons and sponsoring events |
Once this proposal successfully garners community support and passes through a Polkadot gov, we will create a distinct forum post specifically for the nomination of domain allocators. Delegates and community members can self-nominate themselves as a reply to that post for a duration of two weeks. Following the nomination period, a voting will be conducted to elect the domain allocators.
Domain Allocator Roles & Responsibilities:
The following will be the roles and responsibilities of the selected domain allocators.
- Time commitment per week: Full-time program manager and 15 hours per week for the domain allocator, which might vary based on the number of applications. The program manager will ensure that the workload is evenly distributed
- Program Manager:
- Communication:
- Work with the Polkadot community and the elected domain allocators to create and list out the necessary RFPs
- Identify key areas and relevant ecosystem partners who will co-fund grants alongside Polkadot
- Create marketing content for communicating RPFs to the builders
- Coordinate between Polkadot team and the community regarding cohort announcement and funding requirements
- Communicate the information regarding approval/rejection of proposals to the Polkadot community regularly
- Attend community calls, actively participate in the community forum, and keep the community updated and take their feedback on the program
- Regularly update the progress of the grants program to the Polkadot community over Discord and community calls
- Bi-weekly reporting of key metrics of the grants program and each selected project such as:
- Communication:
| Metric | Details |
|---|---|
| Names and summary of accepted proposals | Total number of proposals that have been accepted by each domain allocator along with the proposal summary |
| Grant Amount Disbursed | Names of the proposal that have been awarded a grant amount along with the proposal summary and grant amount |
| Milestone Completion Rate | Each team should have a clear set of milestones and deliverables that they need to achieve. Program manager will share the status on milestone completion for each project |
| User Engagement | Number of users onboarded by a grantee onto their project |
| TVL | TVL (if applicable) of selected projects |
| Project Completion Rates | Number and names of projects who have completed all milestones |
| Growth in community engagement | Measured by number of followers of the project across different social media platforms, Discord community members |
| External Funding | Number of projects that have raised follow on capital after getting a grant from Arbitrum |
-
Grants Program:
- Source good-quality proposals from developer communities
- Sign the transactions for the approved projects
- Ensure a quick turnaround time for proposers regarding their proposal decision
- Coordinate between the domain allocators to ensure that the workload is evenly distributed and take their feedback consistently
-
Domain Allocator:
- Review proposals received for their domains based on the rubrics set by the domain allocator
- Reject/Approve proposals and coordinate consistently with the program manager
- Source applications by reaching out to developer communities in their network
- Discuss program improvements with the other domain allocators and program manager during scheduled meetings
Compensation and Operational Expenses :
To effectively support and fund exceptional teams, domain allocators and program manager will need to invest significant time in activities such as marketing, project research, calls with proposers, preparing reviews, exchanging info/feedback with other DAs, tracking teams’ progress, and coordinating milestone based payouts. These activities demand significant expertise and time commitment. It is crucial for Polkadot ecosystem to attract top talent for the role of domain allocator, program manager and adopt transparent tooling to ensure that exceptional projects are funded.
- The grant budget will be $1.85M with $400k for each domain.
- Questbook will provide the Program Manager along with its decentralised grants orchestration tool ($15000/month) - $45k per quarter
- Domain Allocators : $80/hour (est. $14.4K per quarter at 15 hours/week per domain allocator) - $60k per quarter for 4 domains
- Legal fees and KYC expenses facilitated by the Program Manager. We propose using Synapse for KYC services and Docusign for all contractual agreements, as we have been using these services for CGP 2.0. - $25K for 6 months
All unallocated funds from every domain and committee compensation will be returned to the treasury.
P.S
Once this proposal successfully garners community support and passes through a Polkadot gov, we will create a distinct forum post specifically for the nomination of domain allocators. Delegates and community members can self-nominate themselves as a reply to that post for a duration of two weeks. Following the nomination period, a voting will be conducted to elect the domain allocators.
- We are inviting applications for all domain allocator roles. Once this proposal passes through vote, we will create a separate forum post for the nomination of domain allocators. Delegates and community members can self-nominate themselves under the post for two weeks. After the nomination period, a final vote will be conducted.
Conclusion
What does success look like?
- Objective
- The prime objective of this model is to have domains that align with Polkadot’s priorities. This way the contribution of the projects as part of the grants program is directly adding value to the DAO and the token holders.
- Increase in the number of builders, proposals, and funded projects
- Number of partners who are co-funding grants alongside Polkadot in mutually beneficial areas
- Increase in the community members’ participation to keep grant programs accountable (measured by the number of people looking at the dashboard and participating in the program)
- Diversity in projects being funded across technologies, geographies, and demographics, to name a few. We encourage the community to regularly review the project domains during Polkadot’s community call
- Increased engagement in builder community’s
- Discourse
- Discord, Telegram
- Social media (Twitter, Reddit)
- GitHub
- Subjective
- Improved community involvement in the grants program
- Strengthened builders’ sentiment towards Polkadot
- Enhanced Polkadot’s brand recognition in builder circles
KPIs
- Each domain allocator is required to work alongside program manager and come up with domain-specific rubrics similar to the following in order to evaluate the proposals. If the identified rubrics are not in line with the domain or Polkadot’s roadmap, anyone from the community can openly suggest changes or question them on the forum.
- Total number of proposals received, number of proposals received for each domain, number of proposals funded, turn around time to take a decision and for disbursal, milestone and project completion rates
- The program manager will share reports and conduct AMAs once every two weeks to ensure transparency and accountability.
- We welcome any suggestions for additional qualitative or quantitative metrics not included above
- Questbook product is a decentralized on-chain grants orchestration tool. Anyone from the community can view the data and create custom dashboards using the on chain data relevant to Polkadot Grants Program in a permissionless manner.
Track the performance of the grants program
Anyone from the community can track the number of proposals, funding available for builders for a particular domain, and accepted proposals from the Homepage.
About Questbook:
Questbook’s role in Polkadot’s Grant Program
- Questbook will be the program manager. Questbook has previously worked very closely with the Program Manager of Polygon, where they facilitated the disbursement of approximately $1 million in grants. Questbook has received grants from Solana and IoTeX to establish its grant program, and we also manage the Compound Grants Program 2.0. We have spoken to more than 100 builders and teams over the last 6-8 months and understand what it takes to make a grant program successful from both the program manager and builder perspectives.
- Questbook Grants tool will make sure the workflows are systematic and transparent.
Product Flows
- Posting a grant - Link
- Reviewing and Funding Proposals - Link
- Settings - Link
- Communicating with Builders - Link
- Funding Builders - Link
Credentials
- Questbook (YC-W21) is a decentralized grant orchestration tool, currently being used by Compound, Polygon, AAVE, Celo & Solana Ecosystem
- Questbook will be the program manager. Questbook has previously worked very closely with the Program Manager of Polygon, where they facilitated the disbursement of approximately $1 million in grants. Questbook has received grants from Solana and IoTeX to establish its grant program, and we also manage the Compound Grants Program 2.0. We have spoken to more than 100 builders and teams over the last 6-8 months and understand what it takes to make a grant program successful from both the program manager and builder perspectives.
Community Buy - in and Next Steps
We welcome any comments on our proposal from the Polkadot community and would love to seek suggestions/answer any questions.
Comments (2)






How much time have you guys spent in Polkadot? Clearly none.
The bounties track does everything that you are trying to do here. And usually for almost free.
@ProposalCritic
Thank you for your comments! Really appreciate it. While we acknowledge and appreciate the benefits of the bounties track, we believe that a dedicated grants program run through community elected experts in a transparent and accountable manner will offer additional value that is critical to grow and further Polkadot’s mission. Here's how:
Using the DDA model, Domain Allocators can assess and share the acceptance rate and success metrics with the community. This is not the case currently as the curators are assigned to every ad hoc bounty without a broad understanding of budgetary needs for a focus area. With the proposed model, the Domain Allocators also have the opportunity to ensure projects are paid after milestones are hit ensuring accountability and value creation.
2. Greater Transparency, Community Oversight & Accountability: The DDA model empowers the community to elect and participate in the finalisation of domains, domain allocators, RFPs and acceptance criteria for each domain. This allows for more efficient capital allocation & effective impact assessment of the allocated capital in comparison to the current system of ad hoc bounties without any assessment of priorities & expected impact. All the key variables (domains, proposals, budget etc) can be tracked using the Questbook platform. The community can assess funding in real time & is empowered to change the domain & the budget associated with them during/after the proposed program.The community also elects a domain allocator with expertise who will approve proposals that are aligned with the Polkadot’s priorities and roadmap . If the community feels the domain allocator is not meeting the expected standards the domain allocator can be replaced. If they are doing a good job, their tenure can be extended.
Diversification into Stable Assets: The DDA model integrates multi sig wallets into the structure that allow for diversification into stable assets. This prevents budget constraints arising from volatility risk caused by a sole DOT payout, a key downside that impacts proposal budgets & creates massive admin overhead of dealing with the fallout of volatility for project funding & reporting.
Attracting & Funding High Quality Builders: Having the Polkadot grants program hosted on Questbook will lead to a greater developer mindshare among high quality developers. Questbook has enabled the discovery & fulfillment of key RFPs for Polygon, TON, Compound & more through our developer audience of 20k+ builders. Delegated Domain Capital Allocation Model and Questbook’s organic builder traffic of 20,000+ builders/month will enable the the Polkadot community to source and fund significantly greater number of high quality proposals in a transparent manner.
Sourcing, reviewing, funding, marketing, tracking and nurturing proposals for each domain demands significant expertise and time commitment. The Program Manager will assist the domain allocators with sourcing these high impact activities and any operational support as specified in the responsibilities section of the proposal.
We would love to connect with you to have a more detailed discussion and address any further comments. We appreciate your comments and are open to making changes to our proposal to avoid any redundancies. Moreover, our team will be attending the upcoming community calls for further feedback.
Privately administered funds sorta make sense with off-chain governance and grant awards done off-chain.
With is that being said, and with Polkadot already having the Bounties track. What does this proposal really has to effer for your steep administrative fees?
Increase in quality proposals. This is done because "Questbook is a desired destination for 20,000+ builders each month", even though the treasury will have to pay for marketing according to the proposal. But it seems that the same pool of builders can submit directy to OpenGov, no administrative fees added.
Aligned allocation of funds through "minimising bureaucracy" sounds counterintuitive in this sense. Because Questbook sounds like it's the added element of bureaucracy between builders and the treasury and the work done through the DDA and PM.
Moreover, the Delegated Domain Allocator 80$/h role and the Program Manager role provided by Questbook (15k month) sound like two roles that shouldn't be paid by the treasury and whose accumulative price will increase as more participants join your program seeking Polkadot funding (in case your program was activated for Polkadot) which doesn't make sense for sutainability of the treasury. It's just added administrative fees. Just imagine how much we had to pay for a DDA and PM at those rates for each successful funding referendum.
Also, why go straight for ~2M on Polkadot when on Polygon, Guestbook was granted just half of that. Why not start small and go large?
Moreover, make sure to verify your ID so that people know it's really the same entity who's asking for the funds.
Here you can follow the guide for ID verification.
https://support.polkadot.network/support/solutions/articles/65000181990-how-to-request-and-cancel-identity-judgement
@saxemberg Thank you for sharing your thoughts and comments. Please find below our response.
Privately administered funds sorta make sense with off-chain governance and grant awards done off-chain.
All proposals will be reviewed and funded by community elected experts. By funding proposals through delegated domain capital allocation model, domain allocators can set maximum thresholds for accepting proposals within their respective domains. Proposals that fall below the threshold can be approved directly by domain allocators, reducing the burden on the community while reserving the on-chain governance process for proposals that exceed the threshold and require broader community input.
With is that being said, and with Polkadot already having the Bounties track. What does this proposal really has to effer for your steep administrative fees? Increase in quality proposals. This is done because "Questbook is a desired destination for 20,000+ builders each month", even though the treasury will have to pay for marketing according to the proposal. But it seems that the same pool of builders can submit directy to OpenGov, no administrative fees added.
The proposed model ensures active community participation and a transparent way to run grants program as all domain allocators will be elected from the community and by the community. While the treasury does not have to pay for marketing explicitly, sourcing high quality proposals aligned with the specified domains and the RFPs is one of the many responsibilities of the program manager and the domain allocator. The proposal does not outline a separate budget for marketing expenses, and the program has no provisions to allocate extra funds towards marketing and branding efforts. This is partly influenced by Questbook's organic traffic and its established relationships with builders and grantees.
Aligned allocation of funds through "minimising bureaucracy" sounds counterintuitive in this sense. Because Questbook sounds like it's the added element of bureaucracy between builders and the treasury and the work done through the DDA and PM.
Thank you for sharing your comments and concerns. We believe that the proposed grants program design successfully strikes a balance between speed, accountability and decentralization. The elected domain allocators will run their domains independently in a transparent manner on Questbook. They will take independent decisions for their respective domains based on their evaluation rubric.
The program manager will be responsible to update the community about approved proposals, funded milestone and their details through community calls and bi-weekly community reports. Moreover, the Program Manager will be responsible to reduce the communication and funding TAT, thus increasing the operational efficiency of the grants program lifecycle, right from sourcing high quality proposals to funding them in a transparent manner.
Moreover, the Delegated Domain Allocator 80$/h role and the Program Manager role provided by Questbook (15k month) sound like two roles that shouldn't be paid by the treasury and whose accumulative price will increase as more participants join your program seeking Polkadot funding (in case your program was activated for Polkadot) which doesn't make sense for sutainability of the treasury. It's just added administrative fees. Just imagine how much we had to pay for a DDA and PM at those rates for each successful funding referendum.
We want to emphasise that sourcing, reviewing, funding, marketing, tracking and nurturing proposals for each domain demands significant expertise and time commitment from domain allocators and they should be fairly and competitively compensated for their efforts. The role of domain allocators and the program manager is critical to the success of the proposed model. Additionally, the proposed budget represents the maximum amount needed to ensure the success of the grants program and to avoid the need for frequent community ratification for budgets for the proposed grants program. Another thing to note is that DAOs do not provide healthcare benefits, paid time off, retirement plan, etc. contributions that are typically extended to employees within a traditional company setup. When combined, these perks constitute a significant portion of an employee's overall compensation. To attract top-tier talent from the community to nominate themselves as domain allocators, it is important to offer compensation that aligns with market standards.
The domain allocators and program manager will be required to track their hours and provide monthly reports that will be accessible to the community. If the domain allocators have clocked fewer hours than estimated, the total spend will be lower than the proposed spend. If there are fewer grant requests or smaller grant amount requests for a particular domain, the unused fund from every domain will be returned back to the treasury.
Also, why go straight for ~2M on Polkadot when on Polygon, Guestbook was granted just half of that. Why not start small and go large?
We believe that without attracting significant builder mindshare, the Polkadot ecosystem risks falling behind and losing its competitive edge. Ecosystems such as Mantle, Aave, Uniswap etc. have dedicated significant portions of their treasury towards attracting and funding high quality builders. Polygon disbursed
$1M to builders on Questbook, but they dedicated a significantly larger portion of their treasury towards grants and funding builders ($5M).We are open to revising the overall budget based on the inputs and overall feedback of the community members. We aim to ensure that the allocated funds are deployed in an efficient, responsible and prudent manner. We are open to requesting a smaller budget for the first iteration, with a larger budget in the subsequent iteration of the grants program. This expansion would be considered if our proposed model is successful based on the outlined key metrics and incorporates inputs from the community.
Moreover, make sure to verify your ID so that people know it's really the same entity who's asking for the funds.
Thank you so much for highlighting this! We’ll get this done asap.