Hi Polkadot Community 🤘


I represent [Struggle](https://struggle.wtf/) - service design company specialised in Web3 protocols. We're team of 16 designers & developers based in Helsinki, Finland - partnering globally with the most innovative and promising services in the space. Our process has a strong background in forming intuitive UX/UI solutions for decentralised services.

After having chat with one of Polkadot ambassadors, I thought of asking you for an honest opinion. In short - would it make sense for us to offer our expertise for free for selected Polkadot teams through Treasury Funding pool? And if this would make sense for the community, how would you look at the criteria to the team selection?

Let us know your thoughts!


Best,
Kasper

[Website](https://struggle.wtf/) | 
[Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/struggle.wtf/) | 
[Twitter](https://twitter.com/StruggleCC)


// Some of our partners:


- Phaver / Web3 Social 
- Flowstate / Web3 Gaming
- Raleon / Web3 Attribution
- Nami / Web3 Analytics
- Token Terminal / Web3 Finance


:

- Struggle is a service design company specialised in Web3 protocols.
- Kasper from Struggle is asking for Polkadot community's opinion regarding offering its expertise for free for selected Polkadot teams through Treasury Funding pool. 
- If the community finds this viable, ask what criteria should be used for team selection. 
- Some of Struggle's partners: Phaver, Flowstate, Raleon, Nami and Token Terminal.

#1847 Resources on UX/UI through Treasury Funding pool 🎨

No Active Proposals